设计研究的评价:大学建筑教育设计价值的维系

Assessment of Design Research:Maintenance of Architecture Design Value under University Research Evaluation System

面对大学科研评估指标与以设计为核心的研究定位存在偏离,分析2012年香港大学建筑学院的设计研究评估准则草案,论述设计研究的定义、类别与评价标准,提出与大学研究评估体系沟通的有效工具。讨论建成与未建设计、竞赛、策展、写作等不同类型的设计研究,以及它们的发表、获奖与展览。同时探讨建筑刊物影响与引用指数的特殊性,以及设计研究者保持整体而持续的研究论述的重要性,强调建筑学设计与科研期刊论文不同的评价模式,维系并强化以设计为主体的建筑学教育。

Facing dilemmas on how to cope with university’s research evaluation expectation while maintaining design as the core value for architecture discipline,the paper reviews HKU’s Paper on Design Research Assessment Draft in 2012,discusses the definition of design research,including its covered category and assessment criteria,for exploring an effective tool to communicate with university’s research evaluation system.The paper outlines types of design research including built and unbuilt design works,and design competitions and writings,as well as their publications,awards,and exhibitions,highlighting the significance of establishing an integral architectural discourse for design researcher.The paper also argues different ways of interpreting evaluation criteria such as Impact Factor and Citation Index for design research,addressing the differences between evaluating papers published in scientific journal VS.design assessment for architecture research,advocating the importance of sustaining a designed based architectural education.