期刊文献+

基于AirTOp的区域点融合程序运行效益评估 被引量:4

Operation Benefit Evaluation of Point Merge Procedure in Area Based on AirTOp
原文传递
导出
摘要 为了科学、快速地评估点融合技术在区域管制扇区的应用效益,为民航空域管理部门提供客观、科学的参考数据,选取合适的评估指标和建立可靠的扇区空域结构仿真模型具有重要意义。以区域管制扇区为例,分别构建了区域现行空域结构和点融合空域结构模型,并设计了相应的仿真场景,根据实际的运行规则和航班流对比研究了不同空域结构下的运行情况。仿真结果表明,点融合运行模式下,航迹分布更整齐、燃油消耗及冲突次数更少、移交质量更高。 In order to scientifically and rapidly evaluate the application benefit of point merge technology in the area control sector,and to provide objective and scientific reference data for the airspace management department of civil aviation,it is of great significance to select appropriate evaluation indexes and establish reliable sector airspace structure simulation model.Taking control sector of area as an example,the airspace structure model of current airspace structure and point merge in area was constructed respectively and designed corresponding simulation scenes.The operational conditions of different airspace structures were studied according to the same actual operation rules and the same flight flow.The simulation results showed that in the point merge simulation scenes the track distribution was more regular,the fuel consumption and collision were less,and the handover quality was higher.
作者 李丘 尚锋 LI Qiu;SHANG Feng(CAAC Central-southern Airport Design&Research Institute,Guangzhou 510405,China;CAAC Middle South Regional Air Traffic Management Bureau,Guangzhou 510405,China)
出处 《飞机设计》 2021年第2期77-80,共4页 Aircraft Design
关键词 点融合 AirTOp 空域 燃油消耗 point merge AirTOp airspace fuel consumption
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献23

  • 1Long D, Lee D, Johnson J. Modeling air traffic management technologies with a queuing network model of the national airspace system [R]. CR208988, Virginia: NASA,1999:32-40.
  • 2Vranas P B, Bertsimas D, Odoni A R. Dynamic ground-holding policies for a network of airports[J].Transportation Science, 1994,28 (4) : 275-291.
  • 3Newell G F. Airport capacity and delays[J]. Transpotation Science, 1979,13 (3) : 200-240.
  • 4Lee D A, Nelson C, Shapiro G. The aviation system analysis capability airpor~ capacity and delay models[R]. CR-207659, Virginia: NASA, 1998:47-66.
  • 5Long D, Kostiuk P. Integrating LMINET withTAAM and SIMMOD[R]. CR-210875, Virginia:NASA, 2001:25-36.
  • 6International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Annex 11,2001.
  • 7Robinson, S.M. and DeArmon, J.S. (2002), "Benefits of RNAV terminal procedures: air/ground communication reduction and airport capacity im- provements", Proceedings of the 21st IEEE Digital Avionics Systems Conference.
  • 8Klein, K.A., Sprong, K.R., Haltli, B.M., Becher, T.A. and DeArmon, J.S. (2004), "Evaluating opera- tional benefits of terminal RNAV: Las Vegas case study", paper presented at the 23rd IEEE Digital Avionics Systems Conference.
  • 9MacWilliams, P. and Porter, D. (2007), An As- sessment of a Controller Aid for Merging and Se- quencing Traflic on Performance-based Arrival Routes, MITRE.(accessed 11 September 2012).
  • 10Grimaud, I., Hoffman, E., Rognin, L. and Zeghal, K., "Spacing instructions in approach: A stepwise design",Air Traffic Control Quarterly, 13 (2), 2005.

共引文献39

同被引文献40

引证文献4

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部