期刊文献+

小学生英汉字母书写混淆特征的动态系统分析——基于G小学英汉字母书写情况的计量研究

A Dynamic System Analysis of the Confusion Characteristics of English-Chinese Letter Writing in Pupils——Measurement and Analysis Based on English-Chinese Letter Writing in G Primary School
下载PDF
导出
摘要 英汉字母书写混淆问题是我国小学语文和英语学科教学中长期存在的现实问题。基于动态系统论倡导的总体观和动态互动观,结合语言迁移理论,围绕英汉字母书写混淆现象进行研究设计。采用分层抽样的方式,从G小学6个年级中共抽取300名研究对象。利用问卷调查和访谈调查两种研究方法,在同一学年内,对样本进行了两次分学期追踪调查。采取质化量化相结合的分析方法,对两次追踪所得的数据进行分析。研究发现,小学教育阶段出现的英汉字母书写混淆现象不仅有阶段,而且有方向。阶段性和方向性是英汉字母语际混淆现象的主要特征。 The confusion of English and Chinese alphabet writing is a long-term practical problem in Chinese and English teaching in primary schools in China.Based on the concept of general and dynamic interaction advocated by dynamic system theory and the theory of language transfer,this paper studies and designs the phenomenon of confusion in English and Chinese alphabet writing.A total of 300 subjects were selected from 6 grades of G primary school by stratified sampling.In the same school year,the samples were followed up twice by semester by questionnaire and interview.The qualitative and quantitative phase mixing analysis method is used to analyze the data obtained from the two tracking.It is found that the confusion of English and Chinese alphabet writing in primary education is not only stage,but also direction.Stage and directionality are the main characteristics of interlingual confusion between English and Chinese letters.
作者 黄笛飞 陈黎明 Huang Difei;Chen Liming(School of Educational Science,Liaocheng University,Liaocheng 252000,China)
出处 《现代语文》 2021年第2期87-92,共6页 Modern Chinese
基金 山东省社会科学规划项目“20世纪中国的语言应用理论与实践”(04BY206)。
关键词 小学生 英汉字母 书写混淆 特征 动态系统论 primary school students English-Chinese letters writing confusion characteristics dynamic systems theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献55

  • 1李晓.词汇量、词汇深度知识与语言综合能力关系研究[J].外语教学与研究,2007,39(5):352-359. 被引量:106
  • 2Bever,T.G.Regressionin Mental Development:Basic Phenomenon and Theories[M].Hillsdale,NJ:Erlbaum,1982.
  • 3Dromi,E.The one-word period as a stage in language development:Quantitative and qualitative accounts[A].In I.Levin(ed.).Stage and Struaure:Reope ning the Debate[C].Norwood,NJ:Ablex,1986:220-245.
  • 4Fillmore,L.W.When learning a second language means losing the first[J].Early Childhood Research Quarterly,1991(6):323-346.
  • 5Fogel,A.& Thelen,E.Development of early expressive and communicative action:Reinterpreting the evidence from a dynamic systems perspective[J].Development Psychology,1987(23):747-761.
  • 6Hamideh,J.& Hamideh,M.L1 Persian attrition[J].the Linguistics Journal,2006(1):17-46.
  • 7Kaufman,D.& Aronoftf,M.Morphological disintegration and reconstruction in first language attrition[A].In H.W.Seliger & R.M.Vago(eds.).First Language Aurition[C].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1991:175-188.
  • 8Lenneberg,E.H.Biological Foundation of Language[M].New York:Wiley,1967.
  • 9Long,M.H.Maturational constraints on language development[J].Studies in Second Language Acquisition,1990(12):251-285.
  • 10Neisser,U.Interpreting Harry Barhick's discovery:What confers immu-nity against forgetting?[J].Journal of Experimental Psychology,1984(1):32-35.

共引文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部