期刊文献+

互联网+糖尿病共同照护模式的线上自我管理支持对规律复诊2型糖尿病患者代谢指标影响的研究 被引量:22

Influence of remote diabetes self-management support in the background of internet plus diabetes shared care model on metabolic profiles in regularly follow-up patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察互联网+DM共同照护模式的线上自我管理支持对接受规律管理的T2DM患者代谢指标的影响。方法选取2016年10月至2018年12月于北京大学第一医院内分泌科糖尿病共同照护门诊规律随诊超过半年的T2DM患者516例,分为达标组(n=229)及不达标组(n=287),比较两组基本信息、历次就诊时HbA_(1)c、降糖药物使用等资料,Logistic回归分析HbA_(1)c达标的影响因素。结果两组基线资料比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。Logistic回归分析显示,DM病程<5年(OR 1.612,95%CI 1.040,2.497)、不使用Ins(OR 3.825,95%CI 2.567,5.698)、基线HbA_(1)c达标(OR 7.391,95%CI 4.858,11.245)及高强度线上支持水平(OR 1.705,95%CI 1.162,2.501)是规律随访后1年HbA_(1)c达标的影响因素。结论在互联网+DM共同照护门诊管理模式下,执行线上自我管理支持>33.84 min/季度,可提高患者规律随访后1年HbA_(1)c达标率。 Objective To investigate the influence of remote diabetes self-management support on metabolic profiles in regularly follow-up patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM)in Internet plus Diabetes Shared Care model.Methods A total of 516 patients with T2DM who were regularly followed up in Internet plus Diabetes Shared Care model more than half a year were enrolled in this study from October2016 to December 2018.All the patients were divided into achieving target group(n=229)and Not achieving target group(n=287).Demographic data,HbA_(1)c in each visit and diabetic medications were compared between the two groups.Logistic regression analysis was used to explore the influencing factors for target HbA_(1)c achievement.Results There was no significant difference in baseline data between the two groups(P>0.05).Logistic regression analysis showed that disease duration<5 years(OR 1.612,95%CI1.040,2.497),no insulin usage(OR 3.825,95%CI 2.567,5.698),target HbA_(1)c achievement at baseline(OR 7.391,95%CI 4.858,11.245)and high-intensity of online support(OR 1.705,95%CI1.162,2.501)were the influencing factors for target HbA_(1)c achievement after regular follow-up for 1 year.Conclusion In Internet plus Diabetes Shared Care model,remote diabetes self-management support(>33.84 min/quarter)could improve 1-year HbA_(1)c achievement in patients with regular follow-up.
作者 李昂 郭晓蕙 张俊清 LI Ang;GUO Xiaohui;ZHANG Junqing(Department of Endocrinology,Peking University First Hospital,Beijing 100034,China)
出处 《中国糖尿病杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2021年第4期275-278,共4页 Chinese Journal of Diabetes
关键词 糖尿病共同照护 糖尿病 2型 远程管理 糖化血红蛋白 Diabetes shared care model Diabetes mellitus type 2 Remote management Glycosylated hemoglobin
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献25

  • 1Yang W, Lu J, Weng J, Jia W, Ji L, Xiao J, et al. Prevalence of diabetes among men and women in China. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 1090-1101.
  • 2Gaede P, Lund-Andersen H, Parving HH, Pedersen O. Effect of a multifactorial intervention on mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 580-591.
  • 3UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 1998; 352: 837-853.
  • 4Li G, Zhang P, Wang J, Gregg EW, Yang W, Gong Q, et al. The long-term effect of lifestyle interventions to prevent diabetes in the China Da Qing Diabetes Prevention Study: a 20-year follow-up study. Lancet 2008; 371:1783-1789.
  • 5Pi-Sunyer X, Blackburn (3, Brancati FL, Bray GA, Bright R, Clark JM, et al. Reduction in weight and cardiovascular disease risk factors in individuals with type 2 diabetes: one-year results of the look AHEAD trial. Diabetes Care 2007; 30: 1374-1383.
  • 6Polonsky WH, Fisher L, t_iuzman S, Sleber W J, Philis-Tsimikas A, Edelman SV. Are patients' initial experiences at the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes associated with attitudes and self-management over time? Diabetes Educ 2010; 36: 828-834.
  • 7Funnell MM, Brown TL, Childs BP, Haas LB, Hosey GM, Jensen B, et al. National Standards for diabetes self-manage- ment education. Diabetes Care 2011; 34 Suppl 1: $89-$96.
  • 8World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects - Last amended with Note of Clarification on Paragraph 29 by the WMA General Assembly, Washington 2002, and Note of Clarification on Paragraph 30 by the WMA General assembly, Tokyo 2004. http : //www, wma. net/e/policy/b 3.htm.
  • 9Anderson RM, Fitzgerald JT, Funnell MM, Gruppen LD. Thethird version of the Diabetes Attitude Scale. Diabetes Care 1998; 21: 1403-1407.
  • 10Speight J, Bradley C. The ADKnowl: identifying knowledge deficits in diabetes care. Diabet Med 2001; 18: 626-633.

共引文献121

同被引文献251

引证文献22

二级引证文献54

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部