期刊文献+

还原论、层次观与机制解释——兼论现代社会科学方法论的分歧与整合 被引量:3

Reductionism,View of Hierarchy and Mechanism Explanation——Concurrently Discussing on the Divergence and Integration of Methodology in Modern Social Science
下载PDF
导出
摘要 现代社会科学方法论的分歧主要体现在自然与社会、一元论与二元论、个体主义与整体主义等诸多方面的对立,由此所引发的各种争论实质上可聚焦到还原论的适用性问题上。基于层次的视角,探讨个体与社会的关系是还原论的核心问题之一。随着研究不断地推向深入,还原的目标转向为借助发现机制以解释现象,还原的功能转变为促进解释。机制解释可借助层次的概念对从社会到个体的结构进行连贯的阐述,实现与还原解释的互补和联动。对社会科学方法论进行批判性的评价,整合不同观点的合理要素,或许能够为社会科学的研究提供一种可实现性策略。 The divergence of methodology in modern social science are mainly reflected in the opposition in many aspects,such as nature and society,monism and dualism,individualism and collectivism.Such controversies all involve the applicability of reductionism.One of the core issues of reductionism is to clarify the relationship between individual and society based on hierarchical perspective.With the research continues to deepen,purpose of reduction turns to explain phenomena by discovering mechanism,and function of reduction turns to promote explanation.Mechanism can coherently explain the structure from society to individual by the concept of hierarchy and realize the complementarity and linkage with reductionism.Critical evaluation of methodology in social science and integration of reasonable elements from different viewpoints may be able to provide a feasible strategy for social science research.
作者 杨晓坡 YANG Xiao-po(Research Center for Philosophy of Science and Technology,Shanxi University,Taiyuan Shanxi 030006,China;College of Chemistry and Life Sciences,Chifeng University,Chifeng Inner Mongolia 024000,China)
出处 《内蒙古社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第3期56-61,共6页 Inner Mongolia Social Sciences
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“自然主义与规范主义对话中的社会规范研究”(编号:19YJC720048)。
关键词 还原论 个体主义 整体主义 层次 实在论 机制 Reductionism Individualism Collectivism Hierarchy Realism Mechanism
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献21

  • 1金在权,郁锋(译).50年之后的心-身问题[J].世界哲学,2007(1):40-52. 被引量:12
  • 2Feyerabend, Pawl K. , 1963, "How to be a Good Empiricist-A Plea for Tolerance in Matters Epistemological", from Bernard Boumr ( ed. ) , Philosophy of Science, The Delaware Seminar, Vol. 2, New York : Interscience Publishers.
  • 3Nagel, Ernest, 1961, The Structure of Science, Harcourt, Black & World, Inc..
  • 4Nickles, Thomas, 1975, "Two Concepts of Intertheoretic Reduction", Journal of philosophy 70.
  • 5Oppenheim, Paul & Putnam, Hilary, 1958, "Unity of Science as a Working Hypothesis", in Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. I1.
  • 6Schaffner, Kenneth, 1992, "Philosophy of Medicine", in M. H. Salmon et al. , Introduction to the Philosophy of Science, Prentice Hall.
  • 7Oppenheim P and Putnam H. Unity of Science as aWorking Hypothesis[J]. In Feigl H, Seriven M Maxwell G eds. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Seience Vol II, Minneapolis.. University of Minnesota Press, 1958.
  • 8Schaffner K. Approaches to Reduction[J]. Philosophy of Science, 1967(34) : 137-- 147.
  • 9Hull D. Philosophy of Biological Science[M]. Engle- wood Cliffs, N J .. Prentice--Hall,1974:39.
  • 10Rosenberg A. The Structure of Biological Science[M]. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press, 1985 .. 97.

共引文献20

同被引文献84

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部