摘要
数据主权是网络主权延伸到数据层面的必然结果,其背后折射的是国家主权利益,但在行使方式上可能存在不同的利益诉求,并将深刻影响数据跨境流动的效率和成本。自“棱镜门”等多起网络安全事件爆发后,出于维护国家安全、加强公众个人信息保护和促进数字经济发展的现实需要,世界各国(地区)政府纷纷采取措施规制数据跨境流动,催生了美国“云法案”等一批将传统管辖权伸及网络空间的制度设计,深刻地挑战了网络空间秩序,印度等新兴市场国家则通过数据本地化措施予以应对。数据安全属于非传统安全,中国应坚持数据安全流动的基本立场,完善数据跨境流动统一立法,在国际治理中主动开展国际合作,以更具建设性的姿态融入数据全球化进程之中。
The forming of data sovereignty is the inevitable result of cyber sovereignty extending to the data layer.It reflects the interests of national sovereignty,but with different ways of expression which may profoundly affect the efficiency and cost of data cross-border flows.Since the outbreak of many cybersecurity incidents such as the“Prism Gate”,to maintain the national security,strengthen the protection of personal information,and promote the development of the digital economy,governments around the world have taken measures to regulate the cross-border flows of data,which has enacted the US“CLOUD Act”and other institutional designs to extend traditional jurisdiction to cyberspace.These changes have profoundly challenged the order of cyberspace,and emerging market countries,such as India,who have responded via data localization measures.Since data security belongs to the category of non-traditional security.China should insist on the security of data flow,improve unified legislation on data cross-border flow,actively initiate international cooperation in term of international governance of data flow,manage to integrate into the process of data globalization in a more constructive manner.
作者
何傲翾
HE Aoxuan(Law School,Beihang University,Beijing 100083,China)
出处
《北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版)》
CSSCI
2021年第3期18-26,共9页
Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics:Social Sciences edition Edition
关键词
数据主权
数据跨境流动
数据安全
数据本地化
数据治理
data sovereignty
data cross-board flow
data security
data localization
data governance