什么样的地区更易于腐败--基于PEST框架的腐败与反腐败路径的组态分析(fs/QCA)

What Kind of Area is More Corrupt:Configuration Analysis of Corruption and Anti-corruption Path Based on PEST-Framework

腐败发生机制分析和反腐败的路径探索是国家治理的重要组成部分。已有文献缺乏对腐败和反腐败的多重并发条件的有力解释。在PEST框架的基础上,结合中国地方政府治理实际,使用fs/QCA对31省份2016年相关数据进行组态分析。研究发现:腐败是一个复杂的组态问题,需要多重并发条件影响作用;三种类型构成了地区高腐败程度的驱动路径,即“政府—市场平衡型”“官员掠夺型”和“市场—社会平衡型”;三种类型构成地区低腐败程度的驱动路径为“政府—社会协同型”“政府主导型”和“政府—官员强化型”;腐败治理需要“官场+市场+社会”多主体共同承担,并且不同地区的腐败治理路径具有明显差异性。

To analyze the mechanism of corruption and explore the path of anti-corruption is an important part of national governance.Yet,the existing literature lacks a strong explanation for the multiple concurrent conditions of corruption and anti-corruption.On the basis of PEST framework and combining with the reality of Chinese government governance,this paper uses fs/QCA to analyze the relevant data of 31 provinces in 2016.The results show that:first,corruption is a complex configuration problem,which requires multiple concurrent conditions;second,three types constitute the driving path of regional high corruption:“government market balance”“official plunder”and“market society balance”;third,three types constitute the driving path of regional low-level corruption:“government society coordination”“government leading”and“government officials strengthening”;fourth,corruption governance needs to be undertaken by the multiple actors of“government+market+society”,and different areas show different governance paths.