期刊文献+

杭派女装共享产能平台的服务定价研究

Research on Service Pricing of Hangzhou Style Women’s Dress Industry Internet Platform
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为给杭派女装共享产能平台制定最优定价决策,文中考虑了交叉网络外部性、用户偏好程度和平台匹配率,基于杭派女装的特点建立定价模型,考察参数变化对平台定价的影响。研究表明:制造商的交叉网络外部性系数与零售商的最优定价成正比,与自身的最优定价成反比;用户的偏好程度与最优定价呈正相关关系;平台匹配率与最优定价成正比,定价变化幅度取决于双边用户之间交叉网络外部性强度的相对大小;双边用户的交叉网络外部性系数和平台匹配率都会对平台的最大利润造成影响。最大利润随着交叉网络外部性系数与平台匹配率的增加而增加。 In order to make the optimal pricing decision for Hangzhou style women’s dress industry platform,cross-network externalities,user preference and platform matching rate are considered.Based on the characteristics of women’s dress,the pricing mode is established respectively to investigate the impact of parameter changes on platform pricing.The results show that:the manufacturer’s cross network externality coefficient is directly proportional to the retailer’s optimal pricing,and inversely proportional to its own optimal pricing;the user’s preference is positively correlated with the optimal pricing;the platform matching rate is directly proportional to the optimal pricing,and the range of pricing changes depends on the relative strength of cross network externality between bilateral users;The cross-network externality coefficient and platform matching rate of bilateral users will influence the maximum profit of the platform.The greater the crossover network externalities coefficient,the greater the maximum profit;The higher the platform matching rate,the greater the maximum profit.
作者 夏一丹 XIA Yi-dan(School of Economics and Management,Zhejiang Sci-Tech University,Hangzhou 310016,China)
出处 《物流工程与管理》 2021年第5期93-99,共7页 Logistics Engineering and Management
关键词 双边市场 定价 平台匹配率 交叉网络外部性 bilateral market pricing platform matching rate cross network externality
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献34

  • 1Gawer A. Platforms, markets and innovation[M]. UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2010.
  • 2Armstrong M. Competition in two-sided markets[J]. RAND Journal of Economics, 2006, 37(3): 668-691.
  • 3Schmalensee R. Why is platform pricing generally highly skewed? [J]. Review of Network Economics, 2011, 10 (4) : 1-11.
  • 4Nejad M G. Optimal pricing for the growth of innova- tions with direct network externalities: An agent-basedapproach[J]. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 2013, 22(2) :180-190.
  • 5Hinz O, Hann I H, Spann M. Price discrimination in e-commerce? An examination of dynamic pricing in name-your-own price markets [J]. MIS quarterly, 2011, 35(1): 81-98.
  • 6Hagiu A, Halaburda H. Information and two-sided platform profits[J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2014, 34(4): 25-35.
  • 7Sibdari S, Pyke D F. Dynamic pricing with uncertain production cost: An alternating-move approach[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2014, 236 (1) : 218-228.
  • 8Armstrong M, Wright J. Two-sided markets, compet- itive bottlenecks and exclusive contracts[J]. Economic Theory, 2007, 32(2): 353-390.
  • 9Zhu Feng, Iansiti M. Entry into platform-based mar- kets[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2012, 33(1): 88-106.
  • 10张凯,李向阳.部分重叠业务的双边平台企业竞争模型[J].系统工程理论与实践,2010,30(6):961-970. 被引量:24

共引文献90

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部