期刊文献+

Braden-Q联合Glamorgan量表评估重症患儿压力性损伤发生风险的研究 被引量:9

Study on application of Braden-Q combined with Glamorgan Scale for assessing occurrence risk of pressure injury in severely ill children
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:分析Braden-Q联合Glamorgan量表评估重症患儿压力性损伤风险的效能。方法:选取2019年11月—2020年3月我院重症监护室的194例患儿为研究对象,采用Braden-Q量表、Glamorgan量表、一般资料调查表对其进行调查。结果:194例患儿中有23例患儿发生压力性损伤,发生率为11.86%。损伤组患儿Braden-Q评分明显低于无损伤组(P<0.05),Glamorgan量表评分明显高于无损伤组(P<0.05)。Logistic回归分析显示,血清白蛋白、手术时间、Braden-Q评分、Glamorgan评分及是否发生医疗器械相关性损伤、营养不良、大小便失禁、保护性制动均是儿童发生压力性损伤的影响因素(P<0.05)。Braden-Q和Glamorgan量表评估重症患儿发生压力性损伤的最佳截断值分别为17.51分、13.46分;Braden-Q联合Glamorgan量表评估重症患儿发生压力性损伤的敏感度、特异度及曲线下面积(AUC)分别为82.61%、91.23%、0.951。Braden-Q联合Glamorgan量表评估重症患儿发生压力性损伤的AUC显著高于Braden-Q、Glamorgan量表单独进行评估的AUC(P<0.05)。结论:Braden-Q联合Glamorgan量表对重症患儿进行压力性损伤检测效能较高,二者联合更适用于重症患儿压力性损伤风险的评估。
作者 江薇薇 周玉峰 许凤琴 李月 孙素云 JIANG Weiwei;ZHOU Yufeng;XU Fengqin;LI Yue;SUN Suyun(Lianyungang Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University/the First People's Hospital of Lianyungang,Jiangsu 222000 China;不详)
出处 《护理研究》 北大核心 2021年第11期1989-1992,共4页 Chinese Nursing Research
关键词 重症患儿 压力性损伤 Braden-Q量表 Glamorgan量表 调查研究 severely ill children pressure injury Braden-Q Scale G lamorgan scale investigation and study
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献46

  • 1Bohon L. Which pressure ulcer risk assessment scales are valid for use in the clinical setting? [ J ] J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs, 2007, 34(4) : 368 -381.
  • 2Wu SS, Ahn C, Emmuns KR, et al. Pressure ulcers in pediatric patients with spinal cord injury: a review of assessment, prevention, and topical management [ J ]. Adv Skin Wound Care, 2009, 22 (6) : 273 -284.
  • 3Kwong E, Pang S, Wong T, et al. Predicting pressure ulcer risk with the modified Braden, Braden, and Norton scales in acute care hospitals in China's Mainland[J]. Appl Nuts Res, 2005, 18(2) : 122 - 128.
  • 4Defloor T, Grypdonck MF. Pressure ulcers: validation of two risk assessment scales [ J ]. J Clin Nuts, 2005, 14 ( 3 ) : 373 - 382.
  • 5Curley MA, Razmus IS, Roberts KE, et al. Predicting pressure ulcer risk in pediatric patients: the Braden Q Scale[ J ]. Nurs Res, 2003, 52(1): 22-31.
  • 6Barrett R, Tutfle V, Whalen E, et al. Pressure ulcers and nutritional support: a partnership to improve patient outcomes[ J]. J Nurs Care Qual, 2010, 25(2): 145-150.
  • 7McLane KM, Bookout K, McCord S, et al. The 2003 national pedi- atric pressure ulcer and skin breakdown prevalence survey: a multi- site study[J]. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs, 2004, 31 (4): 168 - 178.
  • 8Cakmak SK, Gtil U, Ozer S, et al. Risk factors for pressure ulcers [Jl. Adv Skin Wound Care, 2009, 22(9) : 412 -415.
  • 9Smith BM, Guihan M, LaVela SL, et al. Factors predicting pressure ulcers in veterans with spinal cord injuries[ J]. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 2008, 87(9) : 750 -757.
  • 10Wilborn D, Dassen T. Pressure ulcer prevention in German health- care facilities: adherence to national expert standard? [ J] J Nurs Care Qual, 2010, 25(2): 151 -159.

共引文献316

同被引文献108

引证文献9

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部