中国刑事印证证明的困境与修正

The Predicament and Amendment of Chinese Criminal Verification Proof Mode

中国刑事司法实践长期奉行的印证证明模式存在庭审虚化的缺陷,不利于错案风险防控,影响刑事审判的公正。早期印证证明模式过于机械地追求证据间的印证关系,虽然2012年《刑事诉讼法》引入了“排除合理怀疑”的主观证明标准,但是在事实认定上,科学性仍存不足。在推进以审判为中心的刑事诉讼制度改革背景下,刑事印证证明模式需要继续完善,严格贯彻直接言词原则,实现刑事审判庭审实质化,才能适应司法改革和社会发展的需要。

For a long time,the practice of Chinese criminal justice implement verification proof mode has deficiency in substantive trial,which leads to misjudged cases easily and affects the justice of criminal trials.In early stage,the verification proof mode pursues the verification relationship between evidences too mechanically.Although the Criminal Procedure Law of 2012 introduced the subjective proof standard of"excluding reasonable doubt",but in fact,there is still a lack of scientific nature.Under the background of promoting the reform of the criminal procedure system centered on trial,the verification proof mode needs to be further improved,the principle of direct speech should be strictly implemented,the substantive trial should be realized,so as to meet the needs of judicial reform and social development.