期刊文献+

基于条件判断模型的溢流和溃坝模式灾害演化对比研究 被引量:1

Comparative research on disasters evolution of over-flow and dam-break mode based on conditional judgment model
原文传递
导出
摘要 以灾害传播条件的临界灾害值判断为基础,该文提出了一种能模拟溢流和溃坝模式2种灾害演化的模型。该模型主要考虑了父节点影响度、噪声以及自修复能力等因素的作用,并对灾害传递时所需的临界灾害值和延迟系数单独作用下的2种灾害演化特征进行了对比分析。结果表明:溃坝模式对应的灾害损失远大于溢流模式的;此外,提高连接边形成的临界灾害值对溢流模式中灾害事件的发生具有显著的控制作用;较大的延迟系数可在一定时间内降低终灾害事件的灾害损失值,尤其是对溃坝模式中循环链灾害事件的演化具有很好的控制作用。通过该模型可以进一步研究灾害传播机理及其破坏方式,并以此来制定更有效的灾害应对措施。 A model was developed to describe the evolution of over-flow and dam-break disasters based on critical judgments of the disaster evolution.The model accounts for the effects of various types of causes,self-recovery characteristics,repairs,internal noise and impacts from outside the system.The model was then used in a parametric study of critical disaster parameter values and disaster evolution delay coefficients.The results indicate that the destructive impact of dam-breaks is far greater than that of overflows.In addition,increasing the critical value of the disaster significantly affects the evolution of an over-flow disaster.The disaster losses at a given time,especially the event evolution following a dam break,are reduced by a larger delay coefficient.This models gives insights on disaster evolution that can be used to improve preparedness and disaster response management.
作者 陈长坤 徐童 姬露露 张宇伦 雷鹏 CHEN Changkun;XU Tong;JI Lulu;ZHANG Yulun;LEI Peng(Institute of Disaster Prevention Science and Safety Technology,Central South University,Changsha 410075,China)
出处 《清华大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2021年第6期518-526,共9页 Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology)
基金 国家自然科学基金重大课题(71790613) 国家自然科学基金重点项目(51534008)。
关键词 灾害演化网络 条件判断 溢流和溃坝模式 临界灾害值 延迟系数 disaster evolution network conditional judgment over-flow and dam-break disasters critical value of a disaster delay coefficient
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献72

  • 1刘文方,肖盛燮,隋严春,周菊芳,高海伟.自然灾害链及其断链减灾模式分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2006,25(z1):2675-2681. 被引量:49
  • 2张行南,张文婷,刘永志,邱绍伟.风暴潮洪水淹没计算模型研究[J].系统仿真学报,2006,18(z2):20-23. 被引量:13
  • 3史培军.四论灾害系统研究的理论与实践[J].自然灾害学报,2005,14(6):1-7. 被引量:278
  • 4唐川,师玉娥.城市山洪灾害多目标评估方法探讨[J].地理科学进展,2006,25(4):13-21. 被引量:23
  • 5朱岳梅,刘京,荻岛理,谷本润.城市冠层模型的扩展与验证[J].建筑科学,2007,23(2):84-87. 被引量:11
  • 6KASPERSON J, R KASPERSON, B L TURNER, et al.Vulnerability to global environmental change[ M].KASPERSON J, R KASPERSON. The social contours of risk (Volume II: risk analysis, corporations & the globalization of risk). Lomtnn: Earthscan, 2005: 245-285.
  • 7CUTYER S L, J T MITCHELL, M S SCOTF. Revealing the vulnerability of people and places : a case study of Georgetown county, South Carolina[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2000, 90(4): 713-737.
  • 8林冠慧,吴佩瑛.全球变迁下脆弱性与适应性研究方法与方法论的探讨[J].全球变迁通讯杂志,2094(43):33-38.
  • 9LIVERMAN D M. Drought in Mexico: climate, agriculture, technology and land tenure in Sonora and Puebla J. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 1990, 80( 1): 49-72.
  • 10LIVERMAND M. Vulnerability to global environmental change[ C].KASPERSON R E, D G DOW, J X KASPERSON. Understanding global environmental change: the contributions of risk analysis and management. Worchester, MA: Clark Univeristy, 1990:8-23.

共引文献69

同被引文献20

引证文献1

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部