期刊文献+

免责条款对第三人的限制效力——以货运合同为中心

The Restriction Effect of Exemption Clauses on Third Party—Focusing on Cargo Transportation Contract
下载PDF
导出
摘要 合同的免责条款在一定条件下具有对第三人的效力,包括保护效力和限制效力两个方面。在我国司法实践中,关于快递合同等货物运输合同中的免责条款,已陆续出现基于“委托关系”等法律构成承认免责条款具有对第三人(货物所有权人)的限制效力的判决。在德国法和日本法上,一直有允许承运人向第三人援用货运合同的免责条款的学说和判例,并且都已经立法化。运输业对于风险可控性的诉求具有合理性,现有的“委托关系”等构成难以全面妥善地解决问题。将免责条款理解为托运人和承运人对物的价值的处分,在“善意取得”的框架下展开解释论,可以兼顾运输业和货物所有权人的利益。 The exemption clauses of a contract have an effect on third party under certain conditions,including protection effect and restriction effect.In the judicial practice of our country,with regard to the exemption clauses in courier contracts and other cargo transportation contracts,judgments which recognize exemption clauses having restrictive effect on the third party(the owner of the goods)based on the legal constitution such as the“entrusted relationship”appeared.In both German law and Japanese law,there have always been doctrines and precedents that allow carrier to invoke the exemption clause of the freight contract to a third party,and they have all been legislated.The transportation industry's demands for risk control are reasonable,and the existing“entrusted relationship”and other components are difficult to fully target and properly solve the problem.Understanding the exemption clause as the disposition of the value of the goods by the shipper and the carrier,and expanding the interpretation theory under the framework of“good faith acquisition”would take into account the interests of the transportation industry and the owner of the goods.
作者 班天可 彭颖 Ban Tianke;Peng Ying
出处 《南大法学》 CSSCI 2021年第3期118-136,共19页 NanJing University Law Journal
基金 国家社会科学基金青年项目(项目批准号15CFX066)的阶段性成果。
关键词 免责条款 对第三人效力 合同相对性 货物运输合同 快递合同 Exemption Clause Effectiveness to the Third Party Privity of Contract Cargo Transportation Contract Courier Contract
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献18

  • 1王孝春.论预借、倒签提单行为的法律性质[J].中国海商法研究,1991,21(1):130-139. 被引量:7
  • 2李增力.论预借、倒签提单行为的责任属性[J].中国海商法年刊,1994(1):48-59. 被引量:9
  • 3迟颖.德国消费信贷法规中的关联合同制度——兼论《德国民法典》第358条[J].比较法研究,2006,20(3):63-72. 被引量:14
  • 4[1][德]Herbert Roth,Die Einrede des Bürgerlichen Rechts,München,Verlag C.H.Beck,1988.8.
  • 5[2][德]Joachim Gernhuber,Das Schuldverh ltnis,Tübingen,Verlag Mohr Siebeck,1989.326,729.
  • 6[3][德]Ulrich Franz,Der Einwendungsdruchgriff gem,9 Ⅲ Verbraucherkreditgesetz,Verlag Baden-Baden,Nomos,1996.121.
  • 7[5][德]Friedrich von Westphalen / Volker Emmerich/ Frank von Rottenburg,Verbraucherkreditgesetz Kommentar,K? In,Verlag Dr.Otto Schmidt,1996:34; Hans J Lwowski / Bernd Peters / Wolfgang Grmann,Verbraucherkreditgesetz,Berlin,Verlag Erich Schmidt,1994:193.
  • 8[6][德]Dieter Medicus,Die Akzessoriett im Zivilrecht,JuS 1971:497; Becker-Eberhard,Ekkehard,Die Forderungsgebundenheit der Sicherungsrechte,Bielefeld,Verlag Gieseking,1993:181.
  • 9[7][德]Dieter Medicus,Die Akzessoriet tim Zivilrecht,JuS 1971:497,501.
  • 10姚瑞光.民法物权论[M].大中国图书公司,1995.19.

共引文献211

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部