摘要
目的:对比新型远程雷达监测设备与PSG监测结果的一致性。方法:选取71例患者的监测结果,观察对比两种检测设备对同一患者监测数据的差异性。结果:以监测结果中AHI≥5作为诊断标准,与PSG监测结果比较,新型远程雷达监测设备筛查阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)的敏感度为96.2%,特异度为89.5%,Youden指数为0.857(P<0.01);以PSG结果中LSaO_(2)≤90%作为诊断标准,新型远程雷达监测设备筛查OSA的敏感度为94.3%,特异度为88.9%,Youden指数为0.832(P<0.01)。结论:新型远程雷达监测设备可以作为OSA患者的便携监测设备。
Objective: The result consistency between the new remote radar monitoring equipment and PSG detection is compared. Methods: The monitoring results of 71 patients were randomly selected to observe and compare the difference of monitoring data of the same patient with two kinds of detection equipment. Results: Using AHI≥5 as the diagnostic criteria, compared with PSG monitoring results, the sensitivity, specificity and Youden index of the new remote radar monitoring equipment were 96.2%, 89.5% and 0.857(P<0.01) respectively. Compared with PSG monitoring results, when LSaO_(2)≤90% in PSG monitoring, the sensitivity, specificity and Youden index of the new remote radar monitoring equipment were 94.3%, 88.9% and 0.832(P<0.01) respectively. Conclusion: There the new remote radar monitoring device can be used to monitor OSA.
作者
李瑜
宋勇莉
田超永
刘永收
梁昆
张媛
秦梅
查定军
LI Yu;SONG Yongli;TIAN Chaoyong;LIU Yongshou;LIANG Kun;ZHANG Yuan;QIN Mei;ZHA Dingjun(Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery,the First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University,Xi'an,710032,China)
出处
《临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2021年第4期293-296,301,共5页
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head And Neck Surgery
基金
空军军医大学第一附属医院学科助推项目(No:XJZT18MDT07)。