两篇匿名文章引发的文学争论——从“双簧信事件”到“金梁合论事件”

On the Literary Argument Triggered by Two Anonymous Articles: from the Event of the "Two-Man Action of Writing Letters" to the Event of "Review of JIN Yong and LIANG Yusheng"

"五四"新文学兴起之际并未瞬间取得文坛的主导地位,彼时以鸳鸯蝴蝶派为代表的通俗文学仍是文坛的庞然大物。为声援文学革命、争夺文学话语权,匿名的"双簧信事件"应势而出。将近半个世纪之后,因匿名的《金庸梁羽生合论》一文而引发的"金梁合论事件",再一次呼应了"双簧信事件"的隐喻性主题。就前后两次发生在不同语境中的文学争论的历史背景而言,看似缺少一套共同的叙事话语,实则形异实同,争论的焦点仍旧在于如何定位或书写通俗文学。

At the beginning of the rise of the new literature of May 4 th Movement,it did not immediately take the leading position in the literary world.At that time,popular literature represented by the Mandarin Duck and Butterfly School was still the major.In order to support the literary revolution and fight for the right of literary discourse,the anonymous"Two-man Action of Writing Letters Event"emerged.After nearly half a century,the anonymous event of"Review of JIN Yong and LIANG Yusheng"echoed the metaphorical theme of the former.From the background of the two literary arguments which took place in different context,they seem to lack a common narrative discourse,but they are just different in form and actually the essence is the same.The arguments still focus on how to define or write popular literature.