期刊文献+

小学生认知角度下的师生关系对学业自我效能感的影响:课堂态度的中介效应 被引量:2

The Effect of Teacher-Student Relationship on Academic Self-Efficacy:the Mediating Effect of Classroom Attitude
下载PDF
导出
摘要 探究小学生认知角度下的师生关系对学业自我效能感的影响,采用结构方程模型验证课堂态度在师生关系和学业自我效能感关系间的中介作用,结果发现:小学生认知角度下的师生关系对课堂态度具有正向影响作用;小学生认知角度下的师生关系和课堂态度均对学业自我效能感具有正向影响作用;学生的课堂态度在师生关系和学业自我效能感关系间具有部分中介作用。基于此,教师在教学过程中应当着力与学生建立良好的师生关系,引导学生养成积极的课堂态度,同时帮助学生认识自我,提高学业自我效能感。 For the purpose of exploring the influence of the teacher-student relationship on academic selfefficacy from the cognitive perspective of primary school students,this paper uses the structural equation modeling(SEM)to verify the mediating effect of classroom attitude in the relationship between teacher-student relationship and academic self-efficacy.The results show that:the teacher-student relationship from the cognitive perspective of primary school students has a positive effect on classroom attitude.Both the teacher-student relationship and classroom attitude from the perspective of students’cognition have positive effects on academic self-efficacy.Students’classroom attitude plays a partially mediating role in the relationship between teacher-student relationship and academic self-efficacy.Based on this,teachers should strive to establish a good teacher-student relationship with students in the teaching process,guide students to develop a correct classroom attitude,help students to know themselvesand improve their sense of academic self-efficacy.
作者 赵润泽 Zhao Runze
出处 《教育测量与评价》 2021年第6期32-37,49,共7页 Educational Measurement and Evaluation
关键词 师生关系 学业自我效能感 课堂态度 结构方程模型 teacher-student relationship academic self-efficacy classroom attitude structural equation modeling
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献49

  • 1Bandalos D L, Finney S J. Item parceling issues in structural equation modeling. In Marcoulides G A, Schumacker R E (Eds.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, 2001. 269-296.
  • 2Bagozzi R P, Edwards J R. A general approach for representing constructs in organizational research.Organizational Research Methods, 1998, 1: 45-87.
  • 3Little T D, Lindenberger U, Nesselroade J R. On selecting indicators for multivariate measurement and modeling with latent variables: When “good”indicators are bad and “bad”indicators are good. Psychological Methods, 1999, 4:192-211.
  • 4Little T D, Cunningham W A, Shahar G, Widaman K F. To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 2002, 9:151-173.
  • 5Hu L-T, Bentler P M. Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspeeification. Psychological Methods, 1998, 3(4): 424-453 .
  • 6Cumin P J, West S G, Finch J F. The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1996,1(1): 16-29.
  • 7West S G, Finch J F, Curran P J. Structural equation modeling with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies.In Hoyle R H (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts,issues, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1995.56-75.
  • 8Hau K T, Marsh H W. The use of item parcels in structural equation modeling: Non-normal data and small sample size.British Journal of Mathematical Statistical Psychology, 2004,57:327-351.
  • 9Rushton J P, Brainerd C J, Pressley M. Behavioral development and construct validity: The principle of aggregation. Psychological Bulletin, 1983, 94:18-38.
  • 10Cohen P, Cohen J, Teresi J, Marchi M, Noemi Velez C.Problems in the measurement of latent variables in structural equations causal models. Applied Psychological Measurement,1990,14:183-196.

共引文献324

同被引文献18

引证文献2

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部