期刊文献+

ICU护士对气管插管患者实施身体约束意向量表的修订及信度效度检验 被引量:3

Revision and psychometric testing of the Theory of Planned Behaviour questionnaire to assess critical care nurses'intention to use physical restraints in intubated patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:翻译并修订ICU护士对气管插管患者实施身体约束意向量表,对修订后的量表进行信度和效度评价。方法:采用Brislin翻译模式进行直译和回译;邀请6名专家对翻译后的量表进行修订并进行内容效度评价;采用便利抽样法对杭州市3家三级甲等医院的485名ICU护士进行调查,评价量表的信度和效度。结果:中文版量表包含4个分量表共计35个条目。探索性因子分析共提取4个公因子,累积方差贡献率为65.536%。各分量表条目水平的内容效度指数为0.83~1.00,量表水平的内容效度指数为0.90,Cronbach’sα系数分别为0.826、0.934、0.876和0.501,组内相关系数分别为0.935、0.940、0.925和0.926(均P<0.01)。结论:中文版ICU护士对气管插管患者实施身体约束意向量表在我国文化背景下具有良好的信度和效度,可作为评估ICU护士对气管插管患者实施身体约束意向的工具。 Objective:To translate and revise the Theory of Planned Behaviour questionnaire to assess critical care nurses'intention to use physical restraints in intubated patients(PR-TPB)into Chinese,then to assess the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of PR-TPB.Methods:The Brislin translation model was used for literal translation and back translation.Six experts were invited to revise the translated scale and evaluate the content validity.Totally 485 critical care nurses from three tertiary grade A general hospitals in Hangzhou were recruited and investigated using general information questionnaire and the Chinese version of PR-TPB by convenient sampling,and its reliability and validity were assessed.Results:The Chinese version of PR-TPB included 4 subscales and 35 items in total.Four common factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis,and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 65.536%.The I-CVI was 0.83-1.00 and the S-CVI was 0.90.Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.826,0.934,0.876 and 0.501 respectively,and the test-retest reliability was 0.935,0.940,0.925 and 0.926 respectively(P<0.01).Conclusion:The Chinese version of PR-TPB has good reliability and validity,which can be used as a tool to assess critical care nurses’intention to use physical restraints in intubated patients.
作者 崔念奇 高雯 张玉萍 王丽竹 王飒 宝珠鸣 金静芬 CUI Nianqi;GAO Wen;ZHANG Yuping;WANG Lizhu;WANG Sa;BAO Zhuming;JIN Jingfen(Department of Nursing,The Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine,Hangzhou,310009,China)
出处 《中国护理管理》 CSCD 2021年第5期658-663,共6页 Chinese Nursing Management
基金 中华护理学会2019年度科研课题(ZHKY201913) 浙江大学博士研究生学术新星培养计划项目(202059)。
关键词 身体约束 重症监护室 护士 计划行为理论 信度 效度 physical restraints Intensive Care Unit nurse Theory of Planned Behaviour reliability validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献11

  • 1Wynd CA,Schmidt B,Schaefer MA.Two quantitative approachesfor estimating content validity[J].Western J Nurs Res,2003,25(5):508–518.
  • 2Lindell MK,Brandt CJ,Whitney DJ.A revised index of interrateragreement for multi-item ratings of a single target[J].Appl PsycholMeasurem,1999,23(2):127–135.
  • 3Lawshe CH.A quantitative approach to content validity[J].Personne Psychol,1975,28(4):563–575.
  • 4Hambleton RK,Swaminathan H,Algina J,et al.Criterion-referencedtesting and measurement:Review of technical issues anddevelopments[J].Rev Educat Res,1978,48(1):11–22.
  • 5Martuza VR.Applying norm-referenced and criterion-referenced measurement in education[M].Boston:Allyn andBacon,1977:275–293.
  • 6Lynn MR.Determination and quantification of content validity[J].Nursing Res,1986,35(6):382–385.
  • 7Davis LL.Instrument review:Getting the most from your panel ofexperts[J].Appl Nurs Res,1992,5(4):194–197.
  • 8Polit DF,Beck CT.The content validity index:are you sure youknow what’s being reported?critique and recommendations[J].Res Nurs Health,2006,29(5):489–497.
  • 9Nora JJ.Causes old and new modes,mechanisms and models.Am Heart J,1993,125:1409
  • 10Hoffman JIE.Congenital heart disease:incidence and inheritance.Ped Clin North Am,1990,37:25

共引文献1032

同被引文献37

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部