摘要
近期针对偷换商家二维码的行为如何定性学者争议不断,主要为诈骗罪和盗窃罪两大阵营。行为人偷换二维码在顾客支付货款时取代商户地位获得财产,商户并没有向行为人处分财物的意思和行为,不符合诈骗罪的构成。顾客没有处分商户财产的权限,不成立三角诈骗。行为人获取财物的行为事实上是秘密方式的窃取,顾客扫描二维码进行付款,财产脱离顾客的一瞬间属于商户所有,却被行为人采取不知情的方式窃取,成立盗窃罪。
There is a lot of controversy about how to characterize the behavior of changing qr code.Mainly for the two camps of fraud and theft.The behavior of the actor changing the Qr code to get the property when the customer pays for the goods takes the place of the merchant,and the merchant doesn't mean to dispose the property to the actor,which doesn’t accord with the crime of fraud.The customer does not have the authority which disposes the merchant property,does not establish the triangle swindles.The behavior that the actor obtains the property is in fact the secret way steal,the customer scans the Qr Code to carry on the payment,the property separates from the customer for a moment to belong to the merchant,but is taken the behavior of the actor not knowing the way to steal,establishes the larceny crime.
作者
许桂敏
常笑笑
XU Guimin;CHANG Xiaoxiao(School of Law,Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450001,China)
出处
《周口师范学院学报》
CAS
2021年第3期110-113,147,共5页
Journal of Zhoukou Normal University