期刊文献+

股指期货交易对股票市场操纵行为的影响 被引量:1

The Influence of Stock Index Futures Trading on Stock Market Manipulation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文探究了2015年9月中国金融期货交易所对于股指期货交易规则做出重大调整前后的区别,发现该调整增强了股指期货交易对于股票市场操纵行为的抑制作用,说明该调整具有一定程度的有效性。稳健性分析表明,剔除熔断机制的影响、控制内生性问题以及更换被解释变量指标后,实证回归结果依然成立;影响机制分析发现,股指期货交易通过降低信息不对称性和市场波动性,遏制了市场操纵行为的发生;进一步研究发现,沪深300主力合约对于市场操纵行为的影响程度要强于非主力合约,股指期货交易对创业板、中小板和主板的市场操纵影响程度依次降低,中证500、沪深300和上证50对市场操纵的抑制作用依次递减。 This paper explores the difference before and after the major adjustment of China Financial Futures Exchange to the trading rules of stock index futures in September 2015,and finds that this adjustment has strengthened the restraint of stock index futures trading on stock market manipulation behavior,indicating that the adjustment has a certain degree of effectiveness.Robustness analysis shows that the empirical regression results are still valid after excluding the influence of the circuit breaker mechanism,controlling the endogenous problems,and replacing the explained variable indicators.The analysis of the influence mechanism finds that stock index futures trading can curb information asymmetry and market volatility,then reduce the occurrence of market manipulation.The further research shows that the influence of CSI 300 main contracts on market manipulation behavior is stronger than that of non-main contracts,the degree of influence of stock index futures trading on the market manipulation of ChiNext,SME Board and the Main Board decreases successively,and the restraining effect of CSI 500,CSI 300 and SSE 50 on market manipulation decreases successively.
作者 杜阳 孙广宇 DU Yang;SUN Guang-yu
出处 《中央财经大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第6期39-49,共11页 Journal of Central University of Finance & Economics
基金 国家自然科学基金项目“中国股票市场交易型操纵监测、影响与防范研究——基于分时高频数据云计算的实现”(项目编号:71973070) 国家社科基金青年项目“系统性风险防控视角下中国股票市场反操纵机制研究”(项目编号:18CJY058)。
关键词 股指期货交易 市场操纵 信息不对称 市场波动 Stock index futures trading Market manipulation Information asymmetry Market volatility
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献116

  • 1周春生,杨云红,王亚平.中国股票市场交易型的价格操纵研究[J].经济研究,2005,40(10):70-78. 被引量:49
  • 2徐高.内部交易与价格操纵[J].浙江社会科学,2007(3):12-16. 被引量:2
  • 3Amihud, Y. (2002). Illiquidity and Stock Returns: Cross -section and Time -series Effects. Journal of Financial Markets 5, 31 -56.
  • 4Antoniou, A. , and P. Holmes (1995). Futures trading, information and spot price volatility: evidence for the FTSE - 100 Stock Index Futures Contract using GARCH. Journal of Banking and Finance 19,117 - 129.
  • 5Antoniou, A. , P. Holmes, and R. Priestley (1998). The effects of stock index futures trading on stock index volatility: An analysis of the asymmetric response of volatility to news. Journal of Futures Markets 18, 151 - 166.
  • 6Bohl, M. T. , C. Salm, and M. Schuppli (2011 ). Journal of Futures Markets 31, 282 - 306.
  • 7Campbell, J. Y. , S.J. Grossman, and J. Wang ( 1993 ). Trading Volume and Serial Correlation in Stock Returns. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108, 905 - 939.
  • 8Chan, K. ( 1992 ). A further anaJysis of the lead - lag relationship between the cash market and stock index futures market. Review of Financial Studies 5, 123 - 152.
  • 9Chan, K. , K.C. Chan, and G. A. Karolyi (1991). Intraday volatility in the stock index and stock index futures markets. Review of Financial Studies 4,657 - 684.
  • 10Chordia, T. , A. Sarkar, and A. Subrahmanyam (2005). An Empirical Analysis of Stock and Bond Market Liquidity. Review of Financial Studies 18, 85 -129.

共引文献201

同被引文献9

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部