期刊文献+

“一刀一剪”法建立经腹腹腔镜手术观察镜通道有效性及安全性的研究

The effectiveness and safety of"one scalpel and one scissors"method to establish laparoscopic observation access for transperitoneal laparoscopic surgery
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨"一刀一剪"法穿刺建立经腹腹腔镜手术观察镜通道的临床有效性与安全性。方法收集2018年10月至2020年10月中山市人民医院196例经腹腹腔镜上尿路手术患者的病历资料进行回顾性分析,。根据观察镜通道建立方法分为研究组与对照组,其中研究组("一刀一剪"法)97例,对照组(切开法组)99例,比较两组建立观察通道时严重并发症(Clavien-Dindo3级及以上并发症)、轻微并发症(Clavien-Dindo分级1级或2级并发症)发生率及通道建立时间的差异。结果两组建立经腹腹腔镜手术观察镜通道均无严重并发症发生(血管、肠道、肠系膜或实体器官的损伤);研究组通道建立时间明显缩短[(90±19)s vs(193±25)s,P<0.001],气体泄漏率明显减少(2.06%vs 10.10%,P=0.019),皮下气肿发生率降低(1.03%vs 8.08%,P=0.018),切口感染率(2.06%vs 9.09%,P=0.033)及切口疼痛发生率明显降低(3.09%vs 12.12%,P=0.017)。结论"一刀一剪"法建立经腹腹腔镜手术观察镜通道的方法是一种快速、安全、有效的腹腔镜建立通道方法,值得推广应用。 Objective To compare the outcome of"one scalpel and one scissors"in terms of feasibility and complications with a well-established and widely practiced open access technique(OAT)for a laparoscopic procedure.Methods One hundred and ninety-six participants undergoing transabdominal laparoscopic upper urinary tract surgery in Zhongshan People’s Hospital from October 2018 to October 2020 were collected and analyzed retrospectively,including 97 cases of Group A for"one scalpel and one scissors"and 99 cases of Group B for OAT.The primary endpoint was major complications(bowel,major vessel,and solid organ injury having the potential of causing Clavien-Dindo complication of grade 3 and above)and the secondary endpoint was port access time and minor complications(Clavien-Dindo complication of grade 1 or 2 such as access port-site infection and bleed,subcutaneous emphysema,access port-site pain,entry reattempted,and gas leakage)directly related to access.Patients were assessed for feasibility and complications.Results There was no statistical difference in major complications between Group A and Group B,however,Group A was found to be superior to Group B,in terms of port access time[(90±19)s vs(193±25)s,P<0.001],gas leakage(2.06%vs 10.10%,P=0.019),subcutaneous emphysema(1.03%vs 8.08%,P=0.018),access port-site infection(2.06%vs 9.09%,P=0.033),access port-site pain(3.09%vs 12.12%,P=0.017).Conclusion"One scalpel and one Scissors"method to establish laparoscopic observation access for trans peritoneal laparoscopic surgery is a good and safe technique of laparoscopic access.The technique of"one scalpel and one Scissors"is worthy of popularization and application by laparoscopic surgeons.
作者 卢扬柏 黎卫 张泳欣 黄亚强 曹彬 罗刚 袁润强 黄红星 Lu Yangbai;Li Wei;Zhang Yongxin;Huang Yaqiang;Cao Bin;Luo Gang;Yuan Runqiang;Huang Hongxing(Department of Urology Zhongshan City People's Hospital Affiliated to Sun Yat‑sen University,Zhongshan 528403,China;Department of MR,Zhongshan City People's Hospital Affiliated to Sun Yat‑sen University,Zhongshan 528403,China)
出处 《中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版)》 2021年第3期192-197,共6页 Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition)
基金 2019年中山市人民医院科研基金课题(B2019046) 2019年中山市医学科研项目(2019J042) 2019年中山市科技计划项目(2019B1063) 2020年中山市科技计划项目(2019B1073)。
关键词 腹腔镜 操作通道 “一刀一剪”法 开放法 气腹 并发症 Laparoscopy Access One scalpel and one scissors method Open access Pneumoperitoneum Complications
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献21

  • 1la Chapelle CF, Swank HA, Wessels ME, et al. Trocar types in laparoscopy [ J/CD]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2015, 12: CD009814.
  • 2Abroad G, Gent D, Henderson D, et al. Laparoseopic entry techniques[J/CD]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2015, 8:CD006583.
  • 3Taye MK, Fazal SA, Pegu D, et al. Open versus closed laparoscopy: yet an unresolved controversy[J]. J Clin Diagn Res, 2016, 10 : QC04-7.
  • 4Sundbom M, Ottosson J. Trocar Injuries in 17 446 laparoscopie gastric bypass-a nationwide survey from the Seandinavian obesity surgery registry[ J/OL]. Obes Surg,2016 [ 2016-04-14]. http:// link. springer, com/article/10. 1007% 2Fs11695-016-2080-9. [ published online ahead of print Feb 2,2016].
  • 5Cornette B, Berrevoet F. Trocar injuries in laparoscopy: techniques, tools, and means for prevention, a systematic review of the literature [J/OL]. World J Surg, 2016 [ 2016-07-04 ] . http://link, springer, corn/article/10. 1007% 2Fs00268-016- 3527-9. [ published online ahead of print May 4,2016].
  • 6Simforoosh N, Basiri A, Ziaee SA, et al. Major vascular injury in laparoscopie urology [ J]. JSLS, 2014, 18 : e2014. 00283.
  • 7Gaunay GS, Elsamra SE, Richstone L. Trocars: site selection,instrumentation, and overcoming complications [ J/OL ]. J Endourol, 2016 [2016-07-04 ]. http://online, liebertpub, com/ doi/10. 1089/end. 2016. 0128. [ published online ahead of print Jun 17,2016].
  • 8Bianchi G, Martora na E, Ghaith A, et al. Laparoscopic access overview: Is there a safest entry method? [J]. Actas Urol Esp, 2016,40:386-392.
  • 9Agresta F, Mazzarolo G, Bedin N. Direct trocar insertion for laparoscopy[ J]. JSLS, 2012, 16: 255-259.
  • 10周赶谱,程帆,余伟民,饶婷,阮远,张孝斌.两种经腹腔入路腹腔镜肾上腺手术的临床疗效比较[J].中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2013,7(3):28-31. 被引量:7

共引文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部