期刊文献+

控制感剥夺对欺骗行为的影响:自我控制资源损耗的作用 被引量:1

The Effects of Control Deprivation on Deceptive Behaviors:The Role of Ego Depletion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为探究控制感剥夺与欺骗行为之间的关系及其内在作用机制,采用被试间设计,以76名大学生为被试,首先通过概念形成范式操纵个体的控制感水平,然后用自我损耗量表测量被试的自我控制资源损耗程度,最后采用数字矩阵任务考察被试的欺骗行为.研究发现,控制感剥夺组被试的欺骗行为及自我控制资源损耗程度均显著高于对照组,但自我控制资源损耗在控制感剥夺与欺骗行为之间的中介效应不显著.这表明,控制感剥夺会增加个体的欺骗行为,但自我控制资源损耗并不在其中起中介作用. To explore the relationships between control deprivation and deceptive behaviors as well as the psychological mechanism, this study used between-subject design and selected 76 college students as the subjects. Firstly, the experiment manipulated the subjects’ sense of control by the concept formation paradigm, and then used the ego depletion scale to measure the ego depletion degree of the subjects, finally, used digital matrix task to investigate the deceptive behaviors of the subjects. The results showed that the deceptive behaviors and ego depletion occurred in the control-deprivation group were significantly more than that in the control group, but the mediating effect of ego depletion on the relationships between control deprivation and deceptive behavior was not significant. These results indicated that control deprivation increased deceptive behaviors, but ego depletion did not mediate it.
作者 程楚涵 赛李阳 CHENG Chuhan;SAI Liyang(Institute of Psychological Science,Hangzhou Normal University,Hangzhou 311121,China;Center for Cognition and Brain Disorders,Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University,Hangzhou 310036,China)
出处 《杭州师范大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS 2021年第3期245-250,268,共7页 Journal of Hangzhou Normal University(Natural Science Edition)
基金 国家自然科学青年基金项目(31600875).
关键词 控制感 自我损耗 欺骗行为 sense of control ego depletion deceptive behavior
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献67

  • 1王飞雪,山岸俊男.信任的中、日、美比较研究[J].社会学研究,1999(2):69-84. 被引量:149
  • 2[3]MacKinnon D P, Lockwood C M, Hoffman J M, West S G, Sheets V. A Comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 2002, 7(1): 83~104
  • 3[4]MacKinnon D P, Lockwood C M, Hoffman J M. A new method to test for mediation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Prevention Research, Park City, UT. 1998, June
  • 4[5]Duncan O D, Featherman D L, Duncan B. Socioeconomic background and achievement. New York: Seminar Press, 1972
  • 5[6]James L R, Brett J M. Mediators, moderators and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1984,69(2): 307~321
  • 6[7]Judd C M, Kenny D A. Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 1981, 5(5): 602~619
  • 7[8]Baron R M, Kenny D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51(6): 1173~1182
  • 8[9]Sobel M E. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In: S Leinhardt (Ed.). Sociological methodology 1982. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association, 1982. 290~312
  • 9[10]Sobel M E. Direct and indirect effects in linear structural equation models. In: J S Long (Ed.) Common problems/proper solutions. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1988. 46~64
  • 10[11]Clogg C C, Petkova E, Shihadeh E S. Statistical methods for analyzing collapsibility in regression models. Journal of Educational Statistics, 1992, 17(1): 51~74

共引文献7685

同被引文献10

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部