期刊文献+

可切除胃癌综合治疗模式变化分析 被引量:1

Changes of multimodality therapeutic patterns of care study for resectable gastric cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的调查分析可切除胃癌综合治疗模式的现状,为进一步优化胃癌综合治疗策略提供参考。方法回顾性分析在苏州大学附属第二医院接受手术并具有完整治疗资料的265例可切除胃癌患者。详细记录患者临床特征、术前检查、病理结果、手术和围术期治疗情况以及疗效。分析诊治过程与规范指南的差距,了解胃癌综合模式的变化趋势。结果 2008年(早年组)和2013年(近年组)在我院行胃癌根治术的患者分别为127例和138例,其中行D2根治术的比例分别为52.8%和60.1%(P<0.01),淋巴结清扫数目≥15个为5.5%和52.8%(P<0.01),中位淋巴结清扫数目由6个提高到16个,两组接受新辅助化疗患者分别为2.4%和3.6%(P=0.55)。早年组中接受单纯术后化疗和术后辅助放化疗比例分别为62.2%和2.4%,近年组中的分别为58.0%和8.0%(P=0.04)。此外,术后化疗早年组79例(62.2%),近年组80例(58.0%)(P=0.48)。结论胃癌根治术水平不断提高,治疗逐步规范,但距离日韩等标准的D2根治术还存在差距;术后辅助放疗在内的辅助治疗可使患者获益,但仍有部分应接受辅助治疗的患者未接受治疗,胃癌的综合治疗还需进一步加强。 Objective To investigate and analyze the current status of multimodality therapy for resectable gastric cancer,aiming to provide reference for optimizing the multimodality treatment strategy for gastric cancer.Methods Clinical data of patients diagnosed with gastric adenocarcinoma undergoing radical gastrectomy in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University were retrospectively analyzed.Clinical characteristics,preoperative medical comorbidities,pathological features,surgical and perioperative status and clinical efficacy were recorded.The gap between the diagnosis and treatment procedures and the standard guidelines was analyzed.The changes in the multimodality treatment patterns for gastric cancer were understood.Results A total of 265 patients were included in this study.All patients were divided into two cohorts:early[2008]and late[2013]cohorts.In the early cohort,127 patients were assigned,and 138 cases in the late cohort.In the early cohort,67 patients(52.8%)underwent D2 lymph node dissection,significantly less than 83 patients(60.1%)in the late cohort(P<0.01).In the early and late cohorts,the proportion of patients with the number of lymph node dissection of≥15 was 5.5%and 52.8%(P<0.01).The median number of lymph node dissection was increased from 6 to 16.The proportion of patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the early and late cohorts was 2.4%and 3.6%(P=0.55).In the early cohort,the proportion of patients treated with postoperative chemotherapy and postoperative adjuvant chemoradiotherapy was 62.6%and 2.4%,significantly higher compared with 58.0%and 8.0%in the late cohort(P=0.04).In addition,the proportion of patients receiving postoperative chemotherapy in the early cohort was 62.2%(n=79)and 58.0%(n=80)in the late cohort(P=0.48).Conclusions Although the level of radical gastrectomy has been continuously improved and standardized in China,which still lags behind the standard D2 radical gastrectomy in Japan and South Korea.Adjuvant therapies including postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy can bring clinical benefits.However,the proportion of patients receiving adjuvant therapy is still low,and the multimodality therapy of gastric cancer should be widely applied.
作者 邢鹏飞 周宁 杨咏强 张力元 田野 Xing Pengfei;Zhou Ning;Yang Yongqiang;Zhang liyuan;Tian Ye(Department of Radiotherapy&Oncology,The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University,Institute of Radiotherapy&Oncology,Soochow University,Suzhou 215004,China)
出处 《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2021年第5期457-461,共5页 Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology
基金 苏州市临床重点病种诊疗技术专项项目(LCZX201808)。
关键词 胃肿瘤 治疗模式 综合疗法 Gastric neoplasm Patterns of care study Multimodality therapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献50

  • 1Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin 2009; 59: 225-249.
  • 2Sobin LH, Wittekind C. TNM classification of malignant tumours. 6th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2002.
  • 3Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C. TNM classification of malignant tumors. 7th ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.
  • 4Yokota T, Ishiyama S, Saito T, Teshima S, Narushima Y, Murata K, Iwamoto K, Yashima R, Yamauchi H, Kikuchi S. Lymph node metastasis as a significant prognostic factor in gastric cancer: a multiple logistic regression analysis. Scand J Gastroenterol 2004; 39: 380-384.
  • 5Yoo CH, Noh SH, Kim YI, Min JS. Comparison of prognostic significance of nodal staging between old (4th edition) and new (5th edition) UICC TNM classification for gastric carcinoma. International Union Against Cancer. World J Surg 1999; 23: 492-497; discussion 497-498.
  • 6Hermanek P. pTNM and residual tumor classifications: problems of assessment and prognostic significance. World J Surg 1995;19:184-190.
  • 7Feinstein AR, Sosin DM, Wells CK. The Will Rogers phenomenon. Stage migration and new diagnostic techniques as a source of misleading statistics for survival in cancer. N Engl J Med 1985; 312: 1604-1608.
  • 8Ichikawa D, Kurioka H, Ueshima Y, Shirono K, Kan K, Shioaki Y, Lee CJ, Hamashima T, Deguchi E, Ikeda E, Mutoh F, Yamagishi H. Prognostic value of lymph node staging in gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 2003; 50: 301-304.
  • 9Coburn NG, Swallow CJ, Kiss A, Law C. Significant regional variation in adequacy of lymph node assessment and survival in gastric cancer. Cancer 2006; 107: 2143-2151.
  • 10AurelIo P, D'Angelo F, Rossi S, Bellagamba R, Cicchini C, Nigri G, Ercolani G, De Angelis R, Ramacciato G. Classification of lymph node metastases from gastric cancer: comparison between N-site and N-number systems. Our experience and review of the literature. Am Surg 2007; 73: 359-366.

共引文献3516

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部