期刊文献+

临床和转化医学研究导师胜任力评价量表的汉化和信效度分析 被引量:6

Reliability and validity of the mandarin version of mentor competency assessment
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的引进、汉化临床和转化医学研究导师胜任力评估量表(mentor competency assessment,MCA),并对其进行信效度检验。方法2020年1月至3月,采用Brislin翻译模型进行翻译、回译,并通过专家函询和预调查对翻译初稿进行文化调适。选取北京协和医院153名临床医学博士后导师、副导师为调查对象,采用一般资料调查表和中文版MCA进行调查。对中文版MCA进行信度和效度分析。结果中文版MCA包括保持有效沟通、建立一致的预期和目标、评估学生、培养独立性、尊重多样性、促进学生的职业发展6个维度,26个条目。量表克朗巴赫系数为0.975,Spearman-Brown折半系数为0.951;量表各条目评分与总分呈正相关(r值为0.634~0.823)。量表的条目水平的内容效度指数(I-CVI)为0.6~1.0,量表水平的内容效度指数(S-CVI)为0.954。验证性因子分析结果显示,χ2自由度比(χ2/DF)为1.865,比较拟合优质指数(CFI)为0.925,非标准拟合指数(TLI)为0.914,标准化残差均方和平方根(SRMR)为0.043,近似误差均方根(RMSEA)为0.085(95%CI:0.073~0.096,P<0.01)。结论中文版MCA具有良好信度和效度,适用于我国临床和转化医学研究导师的胜任力评价。 Objective To translate the mentor competency assessment(MCA)into Mandarin,and test its reliability and validity.Methods Brislin translation model was used for translation and reverse-translation.The preliminary translation was culturally adjusted through expert committee discussions followed by a pre-tests.Mentors of clinical post-doctoral trainees at Peking Union Medical College Hospital(PUMCH)were enrolled as the survey subjects(n=153)from January 2020 to March 2020.General questionnaire and Mandarin version of MCA were used.Item analysis,reliability,and validity analysis of the Mandarin version of MCA were tested.Results The Mandarin version of MCA includes 26 items in six dimensions,including effective communication,establishing consistent expectations and goals,evaluating students,fostering independence,respecting diversity,and promoting students'professional development.Reliability analysis showed that Cronbach's coefficient score was 0.975,and split-half coefficient score was 0.951.Each item was positively correlated with the total score(r=0.634~0.823).The item content validity index(I-CVI)is 0.6~1.0,and the scale content validity index(S-CVI)was 0.954.The confirmatory factor analysis results showed that the ratio ofχ2 degrees of freedom(χ2/DF)was 1.865,the comparative fit index was 0.925,the Tucker-Lewis index(TLI)=0.914,and the standardized root mean square residual(SRMR)=0.043,and the root mean square error of approximation(RMSEA)=0.085(95%CI,0.073~0.096,P<0.01).Conclusions The reliability and validity of the Mandarin version of MCA was evaluated and the Mandarin version of MCA is competent to the evaluation of the mentor competency of clinical and translational research mentors in China.
作者 李玥 张丁丁 佟元任 魏怡真 朱惠娟 刘继海 罗林枝 张抒扬 Li Yue;Zhang Dingding;Tong Yuanren;Wei Yizhen;Zhu Huijuan;Liu Jihai;Luo Linzhi;Zhang Shuyang(Department of Gastroenterology,Peking Union Medical College Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences&Peking Union Medical College,Beijing 100730,China;Department of Medical Research Center,Peking Union Medical College Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences&Peking Union Medical College,Beijing 100730,China;Eight-year Program of Clinical Medicine,Enrolled in 2014,Peking Union Medical College,Beijing 100730,China;Department of Education,Peking Union Medical College Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences,Beijing 100730,China;Department of Endocrinology,Peking Union Medical College Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences&Peking Union Medical College,Beijing 100730,China;Department of Cardiology,Peking Union Medical College Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences&Peking Union Medical College,Beijing 100730,China)
出处 《中华医学教育杂志》 2021年第5期472-476,共5页 Chinese Journal of Medical Education
基金 北京协和医学院教育教学改革项目(2020zlgc0110)。
关键词 临床和转化医学研究 导师 胜任力 信度 效度 Clinical and translational research Mentor Competency Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献13

  • 1连智,季新强,刘志民.药物滥用流行病学调查研究进展[J].中国药物依赖性杂志,2006,15(3):244-249. 被引量:6
  • 2McClelland DC. Testing for competence rather than for "intelligence"[J]. Am Psychol, 1973, 28(1).. 1--14.
  • 3Spencer LM, Spencer SM. Competence at work: models for superior performance IMp. Hoboken: John Wiley ~ Sons Inc, 1993.
  • 4Champin D. Competency-based assessment in medi- cal education[J]. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica, 2014,31(3) ..566--571.
  • 5Shumway JM, Harden RM. AMEE Guide No. 25: the assessment of learning outcomes for the compe- tent and reflective physician[J]. Med Teach, 2003, 25(6) :569--584.
  • 6Harden RM, Laidlaw JM. Essential skills for a medical teacher: an introduction to teaching and learning in medicine[M]. London: Churchill Livingstone, 2012.
  • 7蒲晌螟.Delphi-AHP法在医学院校实验教学准备评价体系研究中的应用[D].重庆:重庆医科大学,20]3.
  • 8Fisher M, King JT. Development of a self-directed learning readiness scale for nursing education I-J~. Nurse Edue Today, 2001, 21(7)= 516--525.
  • 9Kennedy HP. A model of exemplary midwifery practice= results of a Delphi study]-J2.J Midwifery Womens Health,2000, 45(1)= 4--19.
  • 10王彦云,商临萍,赵静萍.护理硕士生导师岗位胜任力指标体系初步研究[J].中国护理管理,2011,11(2):39-42. 被引量:31

共引文献27

同被引文献64

引证文献6

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部