期刊文献+

“大数据杀熟”该如何规制?——以新制度经济学和博弈论为视角的分析 被引量:24

The Regulation of Big-Data Driven Price Discrimination:An Analysis Based on New Institutional Economics and Game Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近年来,互联网零售端利用大数据技术实施算法歧视的“杀熟”行为引发诸多批评。大数据杀熟是经济学完全价格歧视行为的表象,体现了新制度经济学中买卖双方对信息产权的诉求。与“杀熟”的不道德直觉相反,大数据杀熟的定价机制将引发市场结构的调整和博弈规则的改变,消费者的谈判地位将得到提升,商家间的竞争将加剧,信息资源的配置将优化。鉴于此,建议对《电子商务法》第十八条算法歧视条款进行限缩解释。在市场机制能够自主完善的领域,法律应保持谦抑和包容。 The Big-data Driven Price Discrimination(BDPD)of the retail-end online shopping raises public concern on the welfare of the consumers.The article 18 of E-Commerce Law responses to this concern by stressing the information disclosing rights of the consumers.This practice,however,might not achieve in the algorithm-based market structure,in which the right to information property is the ultimate target for both of the contracting parties.This paper demonstrates a counter-intuitive market effect of the BDPD:it turns the table of the two sides by changing the rule of the game.The consumers get stronger in the negotiation with more efficient price information while the e-shops in turn,involve in a higher level of competition.We therefore suggest an exemption of BDPD by interpreting the Article 18 of E-Commerce Law restrictively,so as to foster market competition and efficient resource allocation in the context of information technology era.
作者 王潺 WANG Chan
机构地区 厦门大学法学院
出处 《暨南学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第6期52-64,共13页 Jinan Journal(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
关键词 大数据杀熟 算法歧视定价 电子商务法 信息产权博弈 Big Data algorithm discrimination E-commerce law game theory of information property
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献128

  • 1邱格屏.就业基因歧视与我国未来法制设计[J].法学,2001(7):8-12. 被引量:9
  • 2张翔.基本权利的双重性质[J].法学研究,2005,27(3):21-36. 被引量:388
  • 3[美]斯蒂格利茨著 姚开建等译.经济学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1996..
  • 4[日]中山信弘著 张玉瑞译.多媒体与著作权[M].北京:专利文献出版社,1997..
  • 5[1][美]丹尼尔@F@史普博.管制与市场[M].余晖译.上海:上海三联书店、上海人民出版社,1999.
  • 6[3]刘宁平.国际反垄断法[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2002.
  • 7[4]敕源河.公平交易法新论[M].北京:中国政治大学出版社,2002.
  • 8Tamara K Hervey, Justifications for Sex Discrimination in Employment, Butterworths, p.24 (1993).
  • 9(Australia) Disability Discrimination Act 1992, Section 24.
  • 10Council of Europe, Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine, Article 11 (1997).

共引文献888

同被引文献363

引证文献24

二级引证文献86

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部