新形势下高校科研管理分析与路径选择

Analysis and Path Selection of Scientific Research Management in Universities Under the New Situation

【目的/意义】探索新形势下科研管理工作的全新思路、方法与机制,以破除“五唯”等科技政策文件的出台为契机,为完善与之相互衔接匹配的高校科研改革发展制度和措施提供参考。【方法/过程】分析新形势下高校科研管理的现状,针对科研管理工作存在的问题,探讨新形势下高校科研管理路径的提升建议。【结果/结论】研究发现:目前高校的科研管理存在评价激励管理方面指标设置不合理、协同创新管理方面多平台协作不畅通、成果转化管理方面对实质转化不重视以及保障服务管理方面制度设计不灵活等问题。基于此,提出营造健康的科研学术氛围、建立“放管服”科研经费管理制度、加强高校特色新型智库建设、构建科研育人质量提升体系等发展路径。

【Objective/Meaning】The new ideas, methods and mechanisms of scientific research management under the new situation were explored in this paper, and with the introduction of science and technology policy documents such as the abolition of “five only”(referring to only education background, qualifications, only “hat”, only papers, and only projects) as an opportunity, the reference was provided for improving the system and measures of scientific research reform and development in colleges and universities that were connected and matched with them. 【Methods/Procedures】The current situation of scientific research management in colleges and universities under the new situation was analyzed, and the suggestions for improving the path of scientific research management in universities under the new situation were discussed according to the problems existing in the scientific research management. 【Results/Conclusions】The results showed that there were some problems in the current scientific research management in colleges and universities, such as unreasonable index setting in the evaluation and incentive management, unsmooth multi-platform collaboration in the collaborative innovation management, the neglect of substantive transformation in the achievement transformation management, and inflexible system design in the guarantee service management. Based on this, the path choices were put forward, including creating the healthy academic atmosphere for scientific research, establishing the management system for scientific research funds, strengthening the construction of new-type think tanks with the characteristics of university, and constructing the system of quality improvement for scientific education, etc.