智能司法与审判中心主义的矛盾表征和化解进路

Conflict Characterization and Resolution Approach of Intelligent Justice and Judicial Centralism

司法领域人工智能建设的逐步推进,形成了与以审判为中心的司法责任制改革的场域不适和话语冲突,主要表现为庭审实质化的模糊、司法责任制落实的疑问、诉讼结构的失衡和直接言词原则的消弭等。司法实务可以尝试重新定位人工智能裁判的性质,把握人工智能裁判存在于司法场域的界限,进而通过控制人工智能裁判的范围、完善律师的参与权等方式消解矛盾,达到以人工智能裁判服务司法、提高审判效率的目的。

The gradual advancement of artificial intelligence construction in the judicial field has formed field discomforts and discourse conflicts with the trial-centered judicial responsibility system reform,mainly manifested in the ambiguity of the substantive trial of the court,doubts about the implementation of the judicial responsibility system,and the imbalance of the litigation structure.Elimination of the principle of direct speech,etc.Judicial practice can try to reposition the nature of artificial intelligence adjudication,grasp the boundaries of artificial intelligence adjudication in the judicial field,and then resolve contradictions by controlling the scope of artificial intelligence adjudication and improving lawyers’right to participate,so that artificial intelligence adjudication can serve the justice system.The purpose of improving efficiency.