摘要
人工智能技术的应用引发了深刻的变革。人工智能技术促进了养老服务模式、养老服务产业、养老服务管理的智能化转型,人工智能养老服务则提升了养老服务的工作效率,减少了养老服务人力资源成本,促进了养老服务供给与需求间的精准匹配。然而,人工智能技术也给养老服务主体法律地位、养老服务侵权制度、养老服务伦理以及老年人权利保障带来了挑战。养老服务领域应摒弃消极被动的应对模式,通过积极主动的养老服务法律制度重构活动,合理规制人工智能给法律制度带来的新挑战。未来需建立法律主导型的人工智能养老服务法律制度体系,在养老服务法律制度中应遵循老年人权利保护、法律与伦理共同规制原则,及时提升老年人利用智能技术的能力,明确人工智能养老侵权责任的承担规则。
The wide application of artificial intelligence technology in the field of elderly care services promotes the intelligent transformation of elderly care services. Artificial intelligence elderly care machines play an important role in improving the efficiency of elderly care services,reducing the labor costs of elderly care services,and realizing accurate matching of the supply and demand of elderly care services. At the same time,artificial intelligence has also brought challenges to the legal status of elderly care subjects,the responsibility of infringement of elderly care services,the relationship between elderly care law and ethics,and the realization of elderly rights. In the future,on the regulatory path,you can choose the regulatory path of empowerment. On the basis of the law-led intelligent pension legislation system,by giving the elderly the right to interpret algorithms and avoid the automatic decision-making power of intelligent machines,etc.,actively improve the elderly understanding of intelligent technology,the application capability of the smart elderly care system is to clarify the infringement liability system for the smart elderly care,ensure that the behavior of the smart elderly care machine conforms to the legal rules and ethical codes,and play its role in promoting the development of elderly care services.
作者
苏炜杰
徐智华
Su Weijie;Xu Zhihua(Law School,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan,Hubei 430073)
出处
《宁夏社会科学》
CSSCI
2021年第3期77-85,共9页
NingXia Social Sciences
基金
教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“我国现行养老模式面临的法律问题及对策研究”(项目编号:18YJA820028)
中南财经政法大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目“积极老龄化背景下我国居家养老模式面临的法律问题及对策研究”(项目编号:202110616)。
关键词
人工智能
养老服务
养老法律制度
侵权责任
老人权利
artificial intelligence
elderly service law
tort liability
algorithm interpretation right
legal ethics