期刊文献+

中学生课堂公平问卷的编制及信效度的检验

Development and validation of the classroom justice questionnaire for high school students
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为编制适合中国文化背景的中学生课堂公平问卷并检验其信效度,抽取175名中学生进行开放式问卷调查,形成初测问卷,以307名中学生为被试对初测问卷进行项目分析和探索性因子分析,以584名中学生为被试对问卷进行验证性因子分析与信效度检验,形成最终问卷。研究发现,课堂公平问卷包括3个维度:课堂分配公平、课堂程序公平与课堂互动公平,共22个项目。问卷的结构效度、效标效度、内部一致性信度均达到心理测量学要求。因此,本研究编制的问卷信效度良好,可作为中学生课堂公平的有效测量工具。 The purpose of the article is to develop and validate the classroom justice questionnaire for high school students.Specifically,based on the open questionnaire(n=175),the preliminary questionnaire was obtained.Total data from 307 high school students were used to items analysis and exploratory factors analysis.Finally,reliability and validity were tested based on data from 584 students.The findings showed that three factors,such as distributive classroom justice(7 items),procedural classroom justice(8 items)and interactional classroom justice(7 items)were extracted by exploratory factor analysis.The results of construct validity,criterion validity and reliability analysis showed Classroom Justice Questionnaire for High School Students had reached the psychometric standard.In sum,Classroom Justice Questionnaire for High School Students is reliable and valid enough to be applicable to measure high school students’perceptions of justice in the classroom.
作者 王怀勇 阮世萍 郑意颖 WANG Huaiyong;Ruan Shiping;ZHENG Yiying(Department of Psychology,Shanghai Normal University,Shanghai 200234;Kaifeng Qunying Kindergarten,Kaifeng 475001;Hangzhou Kaiyuan Business Vocational School,Hangzhou 310004)
出处 《心理研究》 CSSCI 2021年第3期267-272,共6页 Psychological Research
基金 上海市教育科学研究一般项目(C17001) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目(14YJC190017) 国家自然科学基金青年项目(71701129)。
关键词 中学生 公平 课堂公平 问卷编制 high school students justice classroom justice questionnaire development
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献30

  • 1曾继耘.论差异发展教学与教育公平的关系[J].中国教育学刊,2005(6):28-31. 被引量:32
  • 2张轶文,甘怡群.中文版Utrecht工作投入量表(UWES)的信效度检验[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2005,13(3):268-270. 被引量:528
  • 3金生鈜.什么是正义而又正派的教育——我国教育改革的症结[J].教育研究与实验,2006(3):1-7. 被引量:32
  • 4李锐,凌文辁.工作投入研究的现状[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(2):366-372. 被引量:132
  • 5Luthans F. The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2002,23(6):695-706
  • 6Schaufeli WB, Martinez IM,Marques-Pinto A, et al. Burnout and engagement in university students: A cross-national study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2002, 33 (5): 464- 481
  • 7Schaufeli WB, Salanova M, Gonzalez-Roma V, et al. The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2002, 3:71-92
  • 8Tsui AS, Pearce JL, Porter LW, et al. Alternative approaches to the employee-organization relationship: does investment in employees pay off. Academy of Management Journal, 1997, 40(5): 1089-1121
  • 9Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB, Salanova M. The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A crossnational study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2006, 66(4):701-716
  • 10Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB. UWES-Utrecht Work Engagement Scale: Preliminary manual. Unpublished Manuscript: Department of Psychology, Utrecht University, 2003

共引文献638

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部