期刊文献+

蒙汉族际沟通中民族刻板印象信息的传递机制研究

Study on the Information Transmission Mechanism of Ethnic Stereotype in Mongolian-Han Interethnic Communication
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用单一复述法,考察了蒙古族和汉族面对面传递彼此不同效价的民族刻板印象信息的特点,并对“外群体是否一定被贬损”这一问题进行了回答。结果表明,在蒙古族和汉族间并未表现出外群体贬损,而是外群体偏爱,即蒙古族和汉族均传递了彼此更多的积极民族刻板印象,并且这种外群体偏爱不会受听众的外群体民族身份表明与否的影响。此外,汉族传递的蒙古族积极信息要多于蒙古族传递的汉族积极信息。 This paper,through single retelling,investigated the characteristics that Mongolian and Han face-to-face orally trans-mit each other's ethnic stereotypes with different valence,and answered the question"Is outgroup bound to be derogated?".The re-sults are as follows:The transmission characteristic between Mongolian and Han do not show outgroup derogation,but outgroup fa-voritism,namely,both Mongolian and Han transmit more each other's positive ethnic stereotypes;Moreover,the transmission charac-teristic are not affected by the disclosure of the audience's outgroup ethnic identity;The positive stereotypes of Mongolian transmit-ted by Han are more than the positive stereotypes of Han transmitted by Mongolian.
作者 吴云龙 张玉柱 WU Yun-long;ZHANG Yu-zhu(School of Psychology,Inner Mongolia Normal University,Hohhot Inner Mongolia,010022)
出处 《山西大同大学学报(自然科学版)》 2021年第3期77-78,120,共3页 Journal of Shanxi Datong University(Natural Science Edition)
基金 内蒙古师范大学研究生科研创新基金资助项目[CXJJB19005]。
关键词 蒙汉群体关系 民族刻板印象 信息传递 外群体偏爱 Mongolian-Han intergroup ethnic stereotypes information transmission outgroup favoritism
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献20

  • 1连淑芳.内-外群体偏爱的内隐效应实验研究[J].心理科学,2005,28(1):93-95. 被引量:30
  • 2张莹瑞,佐斌.社会认同理论及其发展[J].心理科学进展,2006,14(3):475-480. 被引量:648
  • 3Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (1998) . Comments on the motivational status of self-esteem in social identity and inter-group discrimi- nation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 317-334.
  • 4Banks, W. C. (1976) . White preference in Blacks: A paradigm in search of a phenomenorr Psychological Bulletin, 83 (6) , 1179-1186.
  • 5Brewer, M. B. (2007) . The importance of being we: Human nature and intergroup relations. American Psychologist, 62, 728-738.
  • 6Dasgupta, N. (2004) . Implicit ingroup favoritism, Outgroup fa- voritism, and behavioral manifestations. Source Social Justice Research, 17 (2), 143-169.
  • 7Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1990) . Social motivation, self-esteem and social identity. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.) , So- cial Identity Theory: Constructive and critical advances. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf. 28-47.
  • 8Jost, J. T., & Burgess, D. (2000) . Attitudinal ambivalence and the conflict between group and system justification motives in low status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, (26) , 293-305.
  • 9Michael, A. H., & Kipling, D. W. (2000) . From i to we: Social i- dentity and the collective self. Group Dynamics: Theory, Re-search, and Practice, 4 (1) , 81-97.
  • 10Norton, M. I., Vandello, J. A., & Darley, J. M. (2004) . Casuistry and Social Category Bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87 (6) , 817-831.

共引文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部