摘要
怀素草书除个别有墨迹传世外,多数保存在历代刻帖或帖目中。通过帖目中帖名的比对,将疑似怀素临摹的作品析出比较,即可发现其曾大量临习王羲之的作品,这对认识怀素的师法有启发性意义。刻帖中另一种蜀本《自叙帖》与传世墨迹本不同,可见怀素生前书写过多本《自叙》作为“行卷”赠送名流显胄,唐代的很多传世书迹或许都有类似的背景。《大草千字文》先刻入宋群玉堂帖,明成化六年(1470)曾由余子俊在陕西西安翻刻一本。通过将美国安思远藏宋精拓本与明陕翻刻本的比对发现,明陕本的底本出自宋群玉堂本的晚拓本系统。
Most of Huaisu’s script were preserved in the ancient inscriptions or posts,except a few ink marks handed down from generation to generation.The suspected works copied by Hua isu were compared with the names of the posts,we can find that he had ever copied Wang Xizhi’s works,which gave enlightening significance to understanding Huaisu’s teachings.Another engraved post self-narrative post was different from the ancient one.It can be seen that Huaisu wrote many copies of self-narration which were presented to celebrities and nobles as“line volumes”.Many ancient works of Tang Dynasty may have the similar background.Cursive Thousand Character was first engraved in Song Qunyu Tang post,and it was engraved again by Yu Zijun in Xi’an,Shaanxi Province in 1470.Through comparison between the American fine copy of Ansiyuan collection in Song Dynasty and the pirated ones in Ming Dynasty,we can find that one of the original Shan manuscripts was originated from late rubbing system of Song Qunyu Tang.
出处
《北华大学学报(社会科学版)》
2021年第1期55-61,151,152,共9页
Journal of Beihua University(Social Sciences)
关键词
怀素
刻帖
师法
行卷书法
《大草千字文》
Huaisu
engraved posts
imitating method
line-volume calligraphy
Cursive Thousand Character