情节犯情节要件中事后要素的解释类型与完善建议

Explanation Types and Suggestions for Improvement of the Post-incident Elements in the Plot Elements of the Circumstance Crime

情节犯既是我国刑法之特色,又是我国刑法中常见的立法类型。纵观现有司法解释,在犯罪行为本身实施完毕后,“行为人拒不改正”“将犯罪所得用于其他违法犯罪用途”以及“经有关机关要求予以纠正而不纠正”或“又实施其他违法犯罪行为”往往被视为情节严重或情节恶劣的重要内容。事后要素不仅可以说明行为时的情状,而且可以表明行为的社会危害性程度,具有存在的合理性,在体系上,拒不改正要素与前置条件属于犯罪主观方面的添加,用途要素和后置条件属于犯罪客体方面的添加。目前,在立法层面,上述要素均存在若干亟待研究解决的问题,需要提出针对性的建议。

The circumstance crime is not only a characteristic of criminal law in China,but also a common type of legislation in criminal law in China.Looking at the existing judicial interpretations,after the completion of the criminal act itself,"the perpetrator refuses to correct","the proceeds of the crime are used for other illegal crimes","the relevant authorities require the perpetrator to correct but the perpetrator still do not correct"or"other illegal and criminal acts are carried out again"are often regarded as serious or bad circumstances.The ex post elements can not only explain the situation of the behavior,but also indicate the degree of social harm of the behavior,so it has the rationality of existence.In the system,the preconditions and the elements of refusing to correct belong to the addition of the subjective aspect of the crime,the use elements and the post-conditions belong to the addition of the object aspect of the crime.At present,at the legislative level,there are a number of problems that need to be studied and solved urgently in the interpretation of the above-mentioned post-event elements,and corresponding suggestions need to be put forward.