期刊文献+

双渠道低碳供应链合作减排优化决策

Optimization of cooperative emission reduction in dual channel low carbon supply chain
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于供应链制造商的高碳减排成本,考虑零售商为制造商投资进行合作减排,在消费者低碳偏好下,建立制造商和零售商之间的博弈模型,对制造商是否减排、零售商是否投资时的供应链最优决策进行对比。研究发现,消费者对低碳产品的偏好行为可以使制造商和零售商的利润都有所增加,但是会出现零售商"搭便车"现象,而零售商投资减排后能消除这一现象。碳减排量和线上线下产品价格都会随零售商投资比例的增加而增加,当零售商投资达到一定比例时,可以实现制造商和零售商双方的利益最大化。 Based on the high carbon emission reduction cost of supply chain manufacturers,considering the retailer s investment for manufacturers to carry out cooperative emission reduction,a game model between manufacturers and retailers is established under the low carbon preference of consumers.The optimal decision-making of supply chain are compared under the circumstances of whether manufacturers reduce emissions and whether retailers invest.It is found that consumers preference for low-carbon products can increase the profits of both manufacturers and retailers,but there will be more profits for retailers than for manufacturers,which can be eliminated after investment of retailers.Carbon emission reduction and online and offline product prices will increase with the increase of retailer investment proportion.When the retailer s investment reaches a certain proportion,it can maximize the benefits of both manufacturers and retailers.
作者 郎玲玲 刘峥 徐琪 LANG Lingling;LIU Zheng;XU Qi(School of Management,Shanghai University of Engineering Science,Shanghai 201620,China;Antai College of Economics and Management,Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai 200240,China;Glorious Sun School of Business and Management,Donghua University,Shanghai 200051,China)
出处 《东华大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS 北大核心 2021年第3期120-128,共9页 Journal of Donghua University(Natural Science)
基金 国家社会科学基金青年资助项目(18CGL015)。
关键词 低碳供应链 合作减排 决策模型 双渠道 低碳偏好 low carbon supply chain cooperative emission reduction decision model dual channel low carbon preference
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献105

  • 1胡锦涛在APEC第十五次领导人非正式会议上的讲话[EB/OL].新华网,2007-09-08http://news.xinhuanet.com/newscented2007-09/08/content_6686906.htm.
  • 2United Nations. Plan of Implementation of the World Summit on Sustainable Development [ R ]. New York: United Nations, 2002.
  • 3Corbett C J, DeCroix G A. Shared-savings Contracts for Indirect Materials in Supply Chains:Channel Profits and En- vironmental Impacts[J]. Management Science, 2001, (7).
  • 4Corbett C J, Kleindorfer P R. Environmental Man- agement and Operations Management: Introduction to Partl ( Manufacturing and Ecologistics) [ J ]. Production and Operations Management, 2001, (2).
  • 5Linton J D, Klassen R, Jayaraman V. Sustainable Supply Chains: An Introduction [ J ]. Journal of Operations Management, 2007, (6).
  • 6Ni D, Li K W, Tang X. Social Responsibility Alloca- tion in Two-echelon Supply Chains: Insights from Wholesale Price Contracts [ J ]. European Journal of Operational Re- search, 2010, (3).
  • 7Jacobs B W, Singhal V R, Subramanian R. An Empirical Investigation of Environmental Performance and the Market Value of the Firm [ J ]. Journal of Operations Manage- ment, 2010, (5).
  • 8Wang C X. A General Framework of Supply Chain Contract Models [ J ]. Supply Chain Management: An Interna- tional Journal ,2002, (5).
  • 9Zugang (LEO) Liu, Trisha D, Anderson M. Con- sumer Environmental Awareness and Competition in Two- stage Supply Chains [ J ]. European Journal of Operational Re- search,2012, (218).
  • 10Amacher G S, Koskela E, Ollikainen M. Environ- mental Quality Competition and Eco-labeling[ J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2004, (47).

共引文献113

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部