期刊文献+

带有偏爱算子的等级信念-愿望-意图逻辑研究

Research on Graded BDI Logic with Preference Operator
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在经典命题逻辑的基础上,运用Pavelka有理数逻辑以及克里普克语义学,建立起来的带有偏爱算子的等级信念-愿望-意图(简称BDI)逻辑系统可以对主体心智状态的强烈程度进行柔性化处理,为Agent(主体、真体、智能)的决策行为进行精确的数值计算以及形式化的逻辑推理,此模型具有广泛的应用价值。 The graded BDI logic with preference operator is established on the basis of classical proposi⁃tional logic,Pavelka rational number logic and Kripke semantics.This logic can flexibly deal with the grades of agents’mental states,and carry out accurate numerical calculation and formal logic reasoning for agents’decision-making behaviors.This model has wide utility value.
作者 陈亚楠 CHEN Ya-nan(Institute of Logic and Information,Sichuan Normal University,Chengdu,Sichuan 610066,China)
出处 《贵州工程应用技术学院学报》 2021年第2期37-42,共6页 Journal of Guizhou University Of Engineering Science
基金 国家社科基金后期资助“人工智能视域下的一阶动态逻辑与Agent行为推理及其哲学反思”,项目编号:20FZXB037。
关键词 偏爱算子 等级BDI逻辑 心智状态 决策行为 Preference Operator Graded BDI Logic Mental State Decision-making Behavior
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献28

  • 1C. Adam, 2007, Emotions: From Psychological Theories to Logical Formalization and Implementation in a BDI Agent, PhD thesis, lnsititut National Polytechnique de Toulouse.
  • 2C. Adam, A. Herzig and D. Longin, 2009, "A logical formalization of the OCC theory of emotions", Sythese, 168(2): 201-248.
  • 3T. Bosse and D. HShle, 2011, "Enhancing believability of virtual soccer players: App- lication of a BDI-model with emotions and trust, developing concepts in applied intel- ligence", Studies in Computational Intelligence, 363: 119-128.
  • 4M. E. Bratman, 1987, Intentions, Plans, and Practical Reason, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • 5A. Casali, L. Godo and C. Sierra, 2005, "Graded BDI models for agent architecture", in J. Leite and P. Torroni (eds.), ComputationalLogic in Multi-agent Systems, pp. 126- 143, Springer.
  • 6A. Casali, L. Godo and C. Sierra, 2008, "A logical framework to represent and rea- son about graded preferences and intentions", Knowledge Representation, pp. 27-37, Menlo Park: AAAI Press.
  • 7A. Casali, L. Godo and C. Sierra, 2011, "A graded BDI agent model to represent and reason about preferences", Artificial Intelligence, 175(7-8): 1468-1478.
  • 8P. R. Cohen and H. Levesque, 1991, "Teamwork", Nons, 24(4): 487-512.
  • 9N. Criado, E. Argente and V. Botti, 2010, "Normative deliberation in graded BDI agents", in J. D. C. Witteveen (ed.), MATES 2010, LNA1, Vol. 6251, pp. 52-63.
  • 10D. Harel, D. Kozen and J. Tiuryn, 2000, Dynamic Logic, Cambridge: The MIT Press.

共引文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部