期刊文献+

创新研究群体项目绩效评价及其对科技评价的启示 被引量:5

Project Performance Evaluation of Creative Research Groups and Its Enlightenment to Science and Technology Evaluation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 将我国国家自然科学基金资助体系中的创新研究群体项目绩效评价工作分为评价筹备、函评会评和绩效评价报告撰写修订发布阶段,以2015年度创新研究群体项目绩效评价为例,梳理分析其工作流程和具体实施情况等相关工作内容。创新研究群体项目具有前沿探索与人才培养双重属性,同时还具有资助力度大、周期长以及考核宽松等特点,相关绩效评价工作结合该类项目特性,基于同行评议和评价指标体系(包括抽查项目与总体项目评价)设计,取得以《国家自然科学基金2015年度绩效报告》为精简版主报告在内的3份研究报告。研究结果提示开展科技项目评价要注重项目的特质与要求,根据国家发展相关战略部署和要求不断改革、规范与优化流程管理,并注重开展同行评议,不断拓展科技评价的范式与边界,以促进科研项目科学合理与平稳有序发展,并促进提升我国科技评价工作水平。 In this paper,the project performance evaluation of creative research groups in the NSFC funding system is divided into three stages of evaluation preparation,letter evaluation and meeting evaluation,and performance evaluation report writing,revision and release.Taking the performance evaluation of creative research group project in 2015 as an example,this paper combs and analyzes its work flow and the concrete implementation and so on.The creative research group project has the dual attributes of frontier exploration and talent training,as well as the characteristics of large funding,long cycle and loose assessment,the relevant performance evaluation work is designed based on the characteristics of the project,peer review and evaluation index system(including spot check project and overall project evaluation),results in three research reports including the 2015 Annual Performance Report of National Natural Science Foundation of China as a streamlined version of the main report.The research results suggest that the evaluation of science and technology projects should pay attention to the characteristics and requirements of the project,constantly reform,standardize and optimize the project process management according to relevant strategic deployment and requirements of national development,pay attention to peer review,and constantly expand the paradigm and boundary of science and technology evaluation,so as to promote the scientific,reasonable,stable and orderly development of scientific research projects,and promote the level of science and technology evaluation in China.
作者 高杰 苏竣 谢其军 Gao Jie;Su Jun;Xie Qijun(Joint Laboratory for Academic Frontier Observation,Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China-Taylor&Francis Group,Beijing 100038,China;School of Public Policy&Management,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China;Center for Science Technology&Education Policy,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China)
出处 《科技管理研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第10期87-91,共5页 Science and Technology Management Research
基金 ISTIC-Taylor&Francis Group学术前沿观察联合实验室开放基金项目“规模与演化视角下中国创新研究群体的团队合作质量与演化规律研究”(IT1902) 国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目“规模视角下中国创新研究群体的团队合作与创新质量研究”(71904101) 国家自然科学基金创新研究群体项目“中国公共政策理论与治理机制研究”(71721002)。
关键词 创新研究群体 创新研究群体项目 科技评价 项目绩效评价 同行评议 creative research groups creative research group project science and technology evaluation project performance evaluation peer review
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献90

共引文献137

同被引文献61

引证文献5

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部