期刊文献+

基于学生成绩残差分解技术的教师教学质量评价 被引量:5

Evaluate Teaching Performance by Residuals of Student Achievement
下载PDF
导出
摘要 运用教育生产函数方法,在控制学生特征、教师特征和学校特征后,学生成绩的预测值与班级均值之差可视为教师教学对学生学业发展的净效应,将此残差值在班级层面加总平均即为教师教学质量的效应量。本文基于课题组在湖北和广东两省收集的数据,利用多层线性模型预测学生成绩,结合学生成绩残差分解技术讨论语文、数学和英语三科教师教学质量的效应量差异。本研究的主要发现是:第一,语文、数学和英语三个科目的教师教学质量的边际效应介于0.3−0.5个标准差间,且数学教师的教学质量对学生成绩的影响最大;第二,教师教学质量的个体间差异较大,若将教学质量处于平均水平的教师替换为最优秀的教师,全班学生的成绩可整体提升0.3个标准差;而将其替换为教学质量最差的教师后,全班成绩将集体下滑0.5-0.7个标准差。在如何科学评价教师“教得好”方面,本研究具有较大的应用价值。 Error-component analysists argue that after netting out the effects of student background,teacher credentials and school characteristics,the residuals of test scores generated by subtracting predicted values from the class-level mean can be regarded as teachers’effect on pupils’achievement.The paper tests this idea by using self-collected teacher-student matched data from Hubei and Guangdong province.Residual analyses show that,(1)Marginal effects of teaching performance of teachers instructing Chinese Language Art,Math and English are among 0.3−0.5 standard deviations,among which the magnitude of Math teachers’effect is the largest.(2)There are huge individual differences among teachers in terms of teaching performance.If a teacher of average quality were replaced by the most effective one,the whole class would witness a net gain of 0.3−1.0 standard deviations.On the contrary,if he or she were replaced by the worst colleague,mean performance of the class he or she taught would go down by 0.5−0.7 standard deviations.Policy implications of this article are obvious with regard to evaluating teachers’performance.
作者 雷万鹏 马红梅 黄华明 Lei Wanpeng;Ma Hongmei;Huang Huaming(Faculty of Education,Central China Normal University/Hubei Institute for Basic Education Research Wuhan,430079;Faculty of Education,Shaoguan University Shaoguan,512005)
出处 《华东师范大学学报(教育科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第7期84-91,共8页 Journal of East China Normal University:Educational Sciences
基金 湖北省教育科学规划重大招标课题“湖北省师范教育改革发展研究”(2018ZDZB11) 韶关市教育局“韶关市基础教育学校公办教师‘县聘校管’改革政策研究”。
关键词 教师评价 教学质量 学生成绩 残差分析 teacher assessment teaching performance students’academic achievement residual analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献58

  • 1Goldstein, H. , Rasbash, J. , Yang, M. , Woodhouse, G. , NuttaI1, D. , & Thomas, S. (1993). A Multilevel Analysis of School Examination Results. Oxford Review of Education, 19, 425-433.
  • 2Goldstein, H. & Sammons, P. (1997). The Influence of Secondary and Junior Schools on Sixteen Year Examination Performance: A Cross-classified Multilevel Analysis. School Ef- fectiveness and School Improvement , 8, 2, 219-230.
  • 3Darling-Hammond, L. & Youngs, P. (2002). Defining "Highly Qualified Teachers" : What does "Scientifically-based Research" actually Tell Us? Educational Researcher, 31, 9, 13-25.
  • 4Scheeren & Bosker. (1997). The Foundations of Educational Effectiveness. Elserier Science Ltd, Oxford, UK.
  • 5Snijders,T. A. B. & Bosker, R. L.. ( 1993 ). Standard Errors and Sample size for Two Level Research. Journal of educational statistics, 18, 3, 237-259.
  • 6Orsak, T. H. (1997). Calculating Missing Student Data in Hierarchical Linear Modeling: Uses and Their Effects on School Rankiongs. Paper Presented at The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, Ill.
  • 7Lazer E. (1980). Family Background and Optimal Schooling Decisions. The Review of E- conomics and Statistics, 62, 1, 42-51.
  • 8[美]列文.提高教育生产率[A].[美]卡诺依.教育经济学国际百科全书(第二版)[M].闵维方等译.北京:高等教育出版社.
  • 9Wheeler,P. H et. al. (1993). Teacher Evaluation Glossary. Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University, Center for Research on Educational Accountability and Teacher Evaluation.
  • 10Wright et. al. (1997). Teachers and Classroom Heterogeneity: Their Effects on Educa-tional Outcomes. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11, 1, 57-67.

共引文献57

同被引文献45

引证文献5

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部