期刊文献+

碳交易试点的电力碳减排政策效应研究 被引量:10

Research on the Policy Effect of Carbon Trading Pilot on Electric Carbon Emission Reduction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 利用2003~2017年我国30个省市(西藏除外)面板数据,根据联合国政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)提出的碳排放核算法从生产侧计算电力行业碳排放量,在此基础上,运用倾向得分匹配(PSM)和双重差分方法(DID)研究碳交易对电力碳减排的影响。结果表明:碳交易政策对电力碳排放具有明显的抑制作用,且时间越长,抑制作用越强。城市化水平、经济发展水平、发电结构、电耗强度是导致电力碳排放增加的重要因素,而企业研发水平、对外开放程度以及环境规制能够显著抑制电力碳排放的增长,产业结构对电力碳排放的影响程度有限。根据上述结论,提出推进碳交易政策实施、提升企业研发水平、加强环境规制等建议。 Based on the panel data of 30 Chinese provinces and cities(except Tibet)in the past 2003~2017 years,the carbon emission of the power industry is calculated from the production side according to the carbon emission accounting method proposed by Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change(IPCC).On this basis,this paper uses the propensity score matching(PSM)and difference-in-differences(DID)methods to study the impact of carbon trading on electric power carbon emission reduction.The results show that:carbon trading policy has a significant inhibitory effect on electric power carbon emissions,and the longer the time increases,the stronger the inhibitory effect is.Urbanization level,economic development level,power generation structure and power consumption intensity are the important factors leading to the increase of electric power carbon emissions.Enterprise R&D level,openness degree and degree of opening up and environmental regulation can significantly inhibit the growth of electric power carbon emissions,while the impact of industrial structure on electric power carbon emissions is limited.Based on the above conclusions,the paper puts forward some suggestions,such as promoting the implementation of carbon trading policy,improving the level of enterprise R&D,strengthening environmental regulation and so on.
作者 王喜平 王素静 WANG Xiping;WANG Sujing(Department of Economics Management,North China Electric Power University,Baoding 071003,China)
出处 《电力科学与工程》 2021年第6期1-8,共8页 Electric Power Science and Engineering
关键词 碳交易 电力碳排放 倾向得分匹配 双重差分 carbon trading electrical carbon emissions propensity score matching difference-in-differences
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献46

  • 1俞燕山,胡军峰,林卫斌,等.“十二五”电力发展若干问题研究[M].北京:中国电力出版社,2010.
  • 2EIA. International Energy Statistics[EB/OL]. http://www.eia.gov/countries/data.cfm/2013.
  • 3IEA.World Energy Outlook 2007: China and India Insights[R]. 2007.
  • 4IEA. CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion 2013 Highlights[EB/OL]. http://www.iea.org/statistics/topics/CO2emissions/.
  • 5Malla, S. CO2 Emissions from Electricity Generation in Seven Asia-Pacific and North American Countries: A Decomposition Analysis[J]. Energy Policy, 2009,37 (1).
  • 6L. Liu, H. Zong, E. Zhao, C. Chen, J. Wang. Can China Realize Its Carbon Emission Reduction Goal in 2020: From the Perspective of Thermal Power Development[J]. Applied Energy, 2014,124(7).
  • 7Z. Tan, L. Li, J. Wang, J. Wang. Examining the Driving Forces for Improving China's CO2 Emission Intensity Using the Decomposing Method[J]. Applied Energy, 2011,88 (12).
  • 8Ang, B.W., Choi K.H. Boundary Problem in Carbon Emission Decomposition[J]. Energy Policy, 2002,30(13).
  • 9Steenhof, P. Decomposition for Emission Baseline Setting in China's Electricity Sector[J]. Energy Policy, 2007,35(1).
  • 10Ang, B. W., Zhang, F. Q., Choi, K. H. Factorizing Changes in Energy and Environmental Indicators through Decomposition[J]. Energy, 1995,23(6).

共引文献74

同被引文献153

引证文献10

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部