期刊文献+

围术期加速康复护理对腹腔镜胆囊切除患者术后早期转归的影响 被引量:21

Effect of enhanced recovery after surgery on the outcome in patients following laparoscopic cholecystectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨手术室护理人员参与的围术期加速康复外科(ERAS)方案对腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)患者术后早期转归的影响。方法:选择ASA分级Ⅰ或Ⅱ级,于2019年1~8月在合肥市第一人民医院行三戳孔LC患者100例,根据不同的护理理念分为观察组和对照组,每组各50例。对照组给予常规护理,观察组实施围术期ERAS方案。结果:两组患者一般情况比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组患者术中发生低体温者降低(P<0.05),术毕至患者首次下床活动时间间隔及首次肛门排气时间均缩短(P<0.05),观察组患者术后总体满意度评分(GSS)高于对照组(P<0.01);两组患者术后恶心呕吐和腹壁戳孔愈合不良发生率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:ERAS方案可降低LC患者术中低体温发生率,利于患者术后良好的转归,有效提高LC患者术后总体满意度。 Objective:To observe the effect of perioperative enhanced recovery program led by nurses in operating room on the outcomes in patients after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Methods:One hundred ASAⅠ-Ⅱpatients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC)were randomly divided into control group and observational group(n=50 for each).Patients in the observational group were nursed with enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS)on conventional nursing basis.Results:The general state of patients remained insignificant between the two groups(P>0.05),yet the patients in observational group had lower incidence of hypothermia during surgery,earlier off-bed activities and anus exhaust after operation as well as higher global satisfaction score(GSS)(P<0.05 or P<0.01).There was no significant difference between groups concerning postoperative incidence of vomiting and poor healing of the port-sites(P>0.05).Conclusion:ERAS program led by nurses in operating room for LC can greatly reduce the incidence of intraoperative hypothermia,promote the outcomes and improve the global satisfaction in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
作者 程惠敏 党爱林 孙霞 CHENG Huimin;DANG Ailin;SUN Xia(Operating Theater,The First People′s Hospital of Hefei,Hefei 230061,China)
出处 《皖南医学院学报》 CAS 2021年第3期298-300,共3页 Journal of Wannan Medical College
基金 合肥市卫生健康委应用医学研究项目(2019-ZC-2)。
关键词 腹腔镜胆囊切除术 加速康复护理 术后康复 laparoscopic cholecystectomy enhanced recovery after surgery postoperative rehabilitation
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献73

  • 1Nicoll ]H. The surgery of infancy. BMJ, 1909, 2(2542): 753-754.
  • 2Philip BK. Day care surgery: the United States model of health care. Ambulatory Surgery, 2012, 17(4): 81-82.
  • 3Castoro C, Bertinato L, Baccaglini U, et al. Day surgery: making it happen. WHO in conjunction with European observatory on health systems and policies. Copenhagen, 2007: 1-32.
  • 4Kjeld MP. The Nordic health care model. The Nordic Health Care Model 9th International Congress on Ambulatory Surgery, Copenhagen, 2011.
  • 5Wilmore DW, Kehlet H. Recent advances: management of patients in fast track surgery. BMJ, 2001, 322(7284): 473.
  • 6Gupta R, Gan TJ. Peri-operative fluid management to enhance recovery. Anaesthesia, 2016, 71: 40-45.
  • 7Nicholson A, Lowe MC, Parker J, et al. Systematic review and meta- analysis of enhanced recovery programmes in surgical patients. Br J Surg, 2014, 101(3): 172-188.
  • 8Gan TJ, Diemunsch P, Habib AS, et al. Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia. Consensus guidelines for the management of postopera- tive nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg, 2014, 118(1): 85-113.
  • 9陈芸,张铭,丁焱.体位干预对妇科腹腔镜术后腹腔引流量的影响[J].中华护理杂志,2010,45(4):314-316. 被引量:17
  • 10李小玲,曾慧,李敬菲.腹腔镜手术治疗输卵管妊娠的护理[J].现代医院,2010,10(5):109-110. 被引量:3

共引文献196

同被引文献204

引证文献21

二级引证文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部