期刊文献+

一种综合赋权的改进FMEA风险评估方法 被引量:7

An Improved FMEA Risk Assessment Method Based on Comprehensive Empowerment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对传统故障模式和影响分析(failure mode and effects analysis,FMEA)方法中的未考虑风险因子权重以及风险因子权重难确定这一问题,提出一种综合赋权的改进FMEA风险评估方法。该方法首先通过FMEA团队明确评估对象和FMEA范围,然后列出所有潜在故障模式,对故障模式进行打分,得到所有的专家打分评估表,再通过语言变量转化为直觉模糊数。由层次分析法确定主观权重,由数据本身确定客观权重,使用直觉模糊混合加权算子(intuitionistic fuzzy hybrid weighted,IFHW)算子集结评价信息,得到所有的故障模式的得分函数,最后基于风险最大化选取每个故障模式的最大分数,进行排名,得到最终的故障模式风险顺序。通过对静电纺丝设备进行FMEA分析,并与其他方法进行比较,验证了所提方法的可行性。 With respect to the problems that the traditional failure mode and effects analysis(FMEA)method does not consider the risk factor weight and the risk factor weight is difficult to determine,a comprehensive weighted improved FMEA risk assessment method was proposed.FMEA team evaluated the object and FMEA range,listed all potential failure modes,scored the failure mode,and obtained all expert scoring evaluation tables.The linguistic variables which could be transformed into intuitionistic fuzzy numbers were used to represent evaluation information of failure modes.The IFHW operator,which combined the subjective weight determined by the AHP method and the objective weight determined by the data itself,was used to aggregate the evaluation information to obtain the score function of all failure modes.The final ranking of all failure modes were selected based on the risk maximization principle.The feasibility of the proposed method was verified by FMEA analysis of the electrospinning equipment and comparison with other methods.
作者 赵翼翔 廖飞飞 王晗 ZHAO Yixiang;LIAO Feifei;WANG Han(Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Micro-nano Manufacturing Technology and Equipment,Guangdong University of Technology,Guangzhou 510006,China)
出处 《工业工程》 北大核心 2021年第3期83-88,共6页 Industrial Engineering Journal
基金 广东省重大科技计划资助项目(X190071UZ190)。
关键词 直觉模糊数 故障模式和影响分析 风险评估 权重算子 风险最大化原则 intuitionistic fuzzy numbers failure mode and impact analysis risk assessment weight operator risk maximization principle
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献60

  • 1汪浩,马达.层次分析标度评价与新标度方法[J].系统工程理论与实践,1993,13(5):24-26. 被引量:128
  • 2李果,高建民,姜洪权.基于多色集合的多重故障建模与推理技术研究[J].计算机集成制造系统,2007,13(4):643-648. 被引量:8
  • 3Atanassov K T. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1986, 20(1): 87-96.
  • 4Li D E Multi-attribute decision making models and methods using intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J]. J of Computer and Systems Sciences, 2005, 70(1): 73-85.
  • 5Lin L, Yuan X H, Xia Z Q. Multi-criteria fuzzy decision- making methods based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J]. J of Computer and System Sciences, 2007, 73(1): 84-88.
  • 6Liu H W, Wang G J. Multi-criteria decision-making methods based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J]. European J of Operational Research, 2007, 179(1): 220-233.
  • 7Xu Z S, Yager R R. Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J]. Int J of General System, 2006, 6(5): 417-433.
  • 8Xu Z S. Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators[J]. IEEE Trans on Fuzzy Systems, 2007, 15(6): 1179-1187.
  • 9Wei G W. Some geometric aggregation functions and their application to dynamic multiple attribute decision malting in the intuitionistic fuzzy setting[J]. Int J of Uncertain Fuzziness Knowledge Based System, 2009, 17(1): 179- 196.
  • 10Tan C, Chen X. Intuitionistic fuzzy Choquet integral operator for multi-criteria decision making[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2010, 37(1): 149-157.

共引文献136

同被引文献64

引证文献7

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部