期刊文献+

普拉洛芬滴眼液联合角膜绷带镜治疗复发性角膜上皮糜烂 被引量:2

Pranoprofen eye drops and bandage contact lens for recurrent corneal erosion syndrome
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究普拉洛芬滴眼液联合角膜绷带镜治疗复发性角膜上皮糜烂的有效性。方法选择63例(63眼)复发性角膜上皮糜烂患者,按治疗方法不同分为普拉洛芬组(32例32眼)及对照组(31例31眼)。两组均配戴角膜绷带镜,并每2周更换一次,持续3个月。治疗时两组患眼均使用左氧氟沙星滴眼液和玻璃酸钠滴眼液滴眼,普拉洛芬组还加用普拉洛芬滴眼液滴眼,所有滴眼液均应用3个月。记录两组患眼治疗前及治疗后3个月的最佳矫正视力(BCVA);于治疗后3 d、7 d、1个月及3个月使用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)记录患眼VAS评分;于治疗后3 d、第1个月内的每周及第2个月、第3个月内的每两周行前节OCT检查了解角膜愈合情况,记录角膜愈合时间。对治愈患者进行2年随访,以观察复发情况。结果普拉洛芬组与对照组患者年龄、性别比例、病因分布及既往复发次数比较,差异均无统计学意义(均为P>0.05)。普拉洛芬组患眼治疗前、治疗后3个月BCVA分别为4.39±0.13和4.76±0.11,对照组患眼治疗前、治疗后3个月BCVA分别4.39±0.15和4.75±0.15,两组患眼治疗后BCVA均较治疗前提高,差异均有统计学意义(t=37.350、25.044,均为P<0.05),两组患眼间治疗前、治疗后3个月BCVA差异均无统计学意义(均为P>0.05)。两组患眼组内治疗前、治疗后各随访时间点间VAS评分两两比较,差异均有统计学意义(均为P<0.05)。两组患眼组间治疗前及治疗后3 d、7 d、1个月、3个月VAS评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(均为P>0.05)。普拉洛芬组、对照组患眼角膜愈合时间分别为(6.63±2.76)周、(5.07±1.86)周,差异有统计学意义(t=2.625,P=0.011)。普拉洛芬组患眼复发率(9.38%)与对照组患眼复发率(29.03%)比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论普拉洛芬滴眼液联合角膜绷带镜治疗复发性角膜上皮糜烂患眼的角膜愈合时间略长,但拥有更低的复发率。 Objective To assess the efficacy of pranoprofen eye drops combined with bandage contact lens in the treatment of recurrent corneal erosion syndrome(RCES).Methods Sixty-three patients(63 eyes)with RCES were divided into two groups Pranoprofen group(32 patients,32 eyes)and control group(31 patients,31 eyes).Both groups wore bandage contact lens and changed them every 2 weeks until 3 months.Levofloxacin eye drops and sodium hyaluronate eye drops were used in both groups,while Pranoprofen eye drops were only used in Pranoprofen group.All eye drops were used for 3 months.The best corrected visual acuity(BCVA)were recorded before and 3 months after treatment.Visual analogue score(VAS)were recorded on day 3,7,the first and third month after treatment.Anterior segment OCT was performed for corneal healing check on day 3,weekly in the first month,and every two weeks in the second and third months.The cured patients were followed up for 2 years to observe the recurrence.Results There were no statistically significant differences in age,gender ratio,etiological distribution,and previous recurrence times between the Pranoprofen group and the control group(all P>0.05).The BCVA before and 3 months after treatment was 4.39±0.13 and 4.76±0.11 in Pranoprofen group respectively,while that in the control group was 4.39±0.15 and 4.75±0.15,respectively.The BCVA after treatment in both groups was higher than that before treatment,and the differences were statistically significant(t=37.350,25.044,both P<0.05).There was no significant difference in BCVA between the two groups before and 3 months after treatment(both P>0.05).There were statistically significant differences in VAS at each follow-up time point within the both groups(all P<0.05).There were no statistically significant differences in VAS on day 3,7,1 month and 3 months after treatment between the two groups(all P>0.05).The corneal healing time of patients was(6.63±2.76)weeks and(5.07±1.86)weeks in Pranoprofen group and control group,respectively,and the difference was statistically significant(t=2.625,P=0.011).The recurrence rate of Pranoprofen group(9.38%)was significantly lower than that of control group(29.03%)(P<0.05).Conclusion Pranoprofen eye drops combined with bandage contact lens in the treatment of RCES has a slightly long healing time,but has a low recurrence rate.
作者 胡利 闻毅颐 李东豪 HU Li;WEN Yiyi;LI Donghao(Department of Ophthalmology,the Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University,Guangzhou 510150,Guangdong Province,China)
出处 《眼科新进展》 CAS 北大核心 2021年第6期566-569,共4页 Recent Advances in Ophthalmology
关键词 普拉洛芬 复发性角膜上皮糜烂 角膜绷带镜 Pranoprofen recurrent corneal erosion syndrome bandage contact lens
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献19

  • 1张鹏,孟春梅,李德强,邱明才.RT-PCR法研究糖尿病大鼠视网膜上TNFα mRNA的表达[J].天津医药,2007,35(8):603-605. 被引量:3
  • 2Watson SL,Lee MH,Barker NH. Interventions for recur- rent corneal erosions (Review)[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2012,9 : CD00 ! 861.
  • 3Karlgard CC,Jones LW,Moresoli C. Survey of bandage lens use in North America,October-December 2002 [J]. Eye Contact Lens, 2004,30(1) : 25-30.
  • 4Stanley JR,Woodly DT, Kratz SL. Structure and function of basement membrane[J].J Invest Dermatol,1982, 79 (Suppl 1) :69-72.
  • 5Bemauer W,De Cock R,Dart JK. Phototherapeutic kera- tectomy in recurrent corneal erosions refractory to other forms of treatment[J]. Eye(Lend), 1996,10(pt 5) :561-564.
  • 6Williams R, Buckley R. Pathogenesis and treatment of re- current[J]. Erosion Br J Ophthalmol, 1985,69(2):435-437.
  • 7Ahad MA,Anandan M,Tah V. Randomized controlled study of ocular lubrication versus bandage contact lens in the primary treatment of recurrent corneal erosion syn- drome[J]. Cornea, 2013,32(2) : 1311-1314.
  • 8Fraunfelder FW, Cabezas M. Treatment of recurrent corneal erosion by extended-wear bandage contact lens[J]. Cornea, 2011,30(2) : 164-166.
  • 9Reidy JJ,Paulus MP,Gona S. Recurrent erosion of the cornea:epidemiology and treatment [J]. Cornea,2000, 19 (6) :767-771.
  • 10陈林,宋志杰.复发性角膜糜烂综合征[J].中国实用眼科杂志,2009,27(11):1224-1228. 被引量:2

共引文献32

同被引文献28

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部