期刊文献+

腋乳入路达芬奇机器人甲状腺手术的临床应用研究 被引量:6

Clinical application of robotic thyroid surgery via bilateral axillo-breast approach
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨腋乳入路达芬奇机器人手术治疗甲状腺乳头状癌的临床效果和优势。方法:回顾性分析2017年11月至2020年3月天津医科大学肿瘤医院行甲状腺手术的338例甲状腺乳头状癌患者的临床资料,其中153例患者接受机器人甲状腺手术(机器人组),185例患者接受传统开放甲状腺手术(开放组)。应用移动平均线法绘制机器人组的学习曲线,分为学习期和平台期,并比较平台期机器人组与开放组的手术效果、并发症发生率及术后切口美容效果的差异。结果:机器人组患者平均年龄(34.7±8.3)岁,开放组患者平均年龄(37.0±8.4)岁,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。在完成16例机器人甲状腺手术后,机器人组的手术时间明显缩短并趋于平稳。平台期机器人组的手术时间、术后引流量多于开放组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组术中出血量、术后引流时间、术后住院时长、中央区淋巴结清扫的总数目和转移数目的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。平台期机器人组术后C-反应蛋白水平显著高于开放组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。平台期机器人组术后第1天切口疼痛视觉模拟评分低于开放组(P<0.05)。两组术后喉返神经损伤、甲状旁腺功能减退的发生率相近(P>0.05)。在全甲状腺切除术后1个月,两组甲状腺球蛋白水平的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。机器人组术后切口美观度的数字评分系统分值高于开放组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001)。结论:腋乳入路达芬奇机器人甲状腺手术治疗甲状腺乳头状癌安全可行,手术效果与传统开放手术相当,术后美容效果突出。 Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy and advantages of robotic thyroidectomy(RT)via the bilateral axillo-breast approach(BABA)in the treatment of papillary thyroid carcinoma(PTC).Methods:The clinical data of 338 patients with PTC who underwent thyroid surgery in Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital from November 2017 to March 2020 were retrospectively analyzed.In total,153 patients underwent RT(robotic group),while the remaining patients underwent conventional open thyroidectomy(COT;open group).The learning curve in the robotic group was drawn using the moving average method;the learning curve was divided into the learning stage and platform stage.The differences in surgical efficacy,complication rates,and postoperative cosmetic outcomes of incisions were compared between the robotic group(in the platform period)and the open group.Results:The mean age was significantly lower in the robotic group than in the open group(P<0.05).After the completion of 16 RTs,the operation time in the robotic group was significantly shortened and stabilized.The operation time was significantly longer and postoperative drainage volume was significantly higher in the platform period in the robotic group than in the open group(P<0.05).There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of intraoperative blood loss,postoperative drainage time,postoperative hospital stay,and the number of dissected central lymph nodes and metastatic lymph nodes(P>0.05).Postoperative C-reactive protein(CRP)levels were significantly higher in the robotic group than in the open group(P<0.05).The visual analogue scale score(VAS)for incision pain on the first postoperative day were lower in the robotic group than in the open group(P<0.001).The incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury and hypoparathyroidism was comparable between the two groups(P>0.05).One month after total thyroidectomy,there was no significant difference in thyroglobulin levels between the two groups(P>0.05).The numerical score system(NSS)scores for postoperative esthetics related to the incision were significantly higher in the robotic group than in the open group(P<0.001).Conclusions:BABA-RT is safe and feasible for the treatment of PTC.Its surgical effect is equivalent to that of COT,and BABA-RT leads to significantly better postoperative cosmetic outcomes.
作者 方艳 岳恺 王雨轩 吴延升 王旭东 Yan Fang;Kai Yue;Yuxuan Wang;Yansheng Wu;Xudong Wang(Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Maxillofacial Oncology,Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital,National Clinical Research Center for Cancer,Tianjin Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy,Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer,Tianjin 300060,China)
出处 《中国肿瘤临床》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2021年第10期533-539,共7页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology
基金 国家重点研发计划项目(编号:2019YFC0119205)资助。
关键词 甲状腺乳头状癌 机器人手术 腋乳入路 临床效果 papillary thyroid carcinoma(PTC) robotic surgery bilateral axillo-breast approach(BABA) clinical efficacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献42

  • 1Kang SW, Jeong JJ, Yun JS, et al. Robot-assisted endoscopic surgery for thyroid cancer: experience with the first 100 patients [ J]. Surg Endosc, 2009,23 ( 11 ) :2399-2406.
  • 2Kwak HY, Kim HY, Lee HY, et al. Robotic thyroidectomy using bilateral axillo-breast approach : comparison of surgical results with open conventional thyroidectomy [ J ]. J Surg 0ncol, 2015, 111 (2) :141-145.
  • 3Lang BH, Wong CK, Tsang JS, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating completeness and outcomes of robotic thyroidectomy [ J ]. Laryngoscope, 2015,125 ( 2 ) :509-518.
  • 4Saeed A, Alsaleh N, Mouhhrop T, et al. Modified approach for robotic retroauricular thyroidectomy: pteclinical simulation and a surgical case[J]. Surg Inanv,2015,22(6) :577-581.
  • 5He Q, Zhuang D, Zheng L, et al. Harmonic focus in total thyroidectomy plus level E-IV and VI dissection: a prospective randomized study [ J ]. W o~ld l Surg Onco1,2011,9 :141.
  • 6Aktas A, Walsh D, Kirkova J. The psychometric properties of cancer multisymptom assessment instruments: a clinical review [J]. Support Care Cancer,2015,23(7) :2189-2202.
  • 7Holsinger FC, Chung WY. Robotic thyroidectomy[ J]. Otolaryngol Clin North Am,2014,47(3) :373-378.
  • 8Kim WW, Jung JH, Park HY. A single surgeon's experience and surgical outcomes of 300 robotic thyroid surgeries using a bilateral axillo-breast approach[J]. J Surg Oncol, 2015, 11! (2) : 135- 140.
  • 9Barehner E, Benhidjeb T. Cervical sear|ess endoscopic thyroidectomy : axillo-bilateral-breast approach (ABBA) [ J]. Surg Endosc, 2008,22( 1 ) : 154-157.
  • 10He Q, Zhuang D, Zheng L, et al. The surgical management of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: a 162-month single-center experience of 273 cases[ J]. Am Surg,2012,78 ( 11 ) :1215-1218.

共引文献117

同被引文献56

引证文献6

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部