期刊文献+

机器人辅助腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜行结直肠癌手术的安全性和有效性比较 被引量:9

Comparison of safety and efficacy between robotic and conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 结直肠癌是最常见的消化道恶性肿瘤之一,严重威胁着患者的身体健康。外科手术是治疗结直肠癌的有效方法。目前,微创手术因创伤小、恢复快等优点,成为许多患者的首选。传统腹腔镜手术在技术上存在一定的难度,它需要外科医生拥有丰富的腹腔镜操作经验。而达芬奇机器人拥有高清的3D镜头、灵活的机械臂以及更符合人体工程学的操作方式,在设计上优于腹腔镜。但多项研究结果显示,机器人结直肠手术的围手术期结果、远期结果与传统腹腔镜相比未见明显优势,而费用却明显增加。目前,机器人结直肠手术已被证实是安全可行的,其便于进行体内肠吻合,并可以缩短学习曲线。达芬奇机器人可在手术空间狭小、解剖复杂的盆腔内操作。在面对内脏肥胖、骨盆狭窄、低位肿瘤等病例时,它的视觉系统也有助于辨识解剖层次,更好的保留盆腔自主神经,可能会促进泌尿与性功能的术后恢复。随着各领域的新技术不断发展和融合,以及外科医生机器人手术经验的积累,相信机器人手术在未来会拥有更广阔的应用前景。 Colorectal cancer is one of the most common digestive tract malignancies,which is a severe threat to human health.Surgery is an effective treatment for colorectal cancer.At present,minimally invasive surgery has become the first choice of many patients since its advantages of minor injury and quick recovery.Laparoscopic surgery is technically difficult,which requires rich experience of surgeons.The Da Vinci robot-assisted surgical system is equipped with high-definition 3D view,flexible robotic arm and good ergonomics,which is superior to laparoscopy.According to latest studies,the perioperative results and long-term results of robot-assisted colorectal surgery showed no obvious advantages over traditional laparoscopy,but the cost is significantly increased.However,robotic colorectal surgery is safe and feasible to perform intestinal anastomosis,which also has a shorter learning curve.Robotic surgery is more suitable for pelvic operation,which has narrow surgical space and complex anatomy.When dealing with visceral obesity,male pelvis and low tumor location,the visual system of robotic surgery system can identify the anatomical level,which may help to preserve pelvic autonomic nerve better during operation and accelerate the recovery of urinary and sexual function after surgery.With the continuous combination of new technologies in various fields and the accumulation of robotic surgery experience for surgeons,it is believed that the robotic surgery will be widely used in the near future.
作者 李书原 楼征 张卫 LI Shuyuan;LOU Zheng;ZHANG Wei(Department of Colorectal Surgery,the First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University,Shanghai 200433,China)
出处 《机器人外科学杂志(中英文)》 2021年第4期277-286,共10页 Chinese Journal of Robotic Surgery
基金 2019年海军军医大学校级“思政课程”、“课程思政”专项课题。
关键词 结直肠癌 腹腔镜 机器人 安全性 有效性 Colorectal neoplasms Laparoscope Robot Safety Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献56

  • 1D. G.Jayne,H. C.Thorpe,J.Copeland,P.Quirke,J. M.Brown,P. J.Guillou.Five‐year follow‐up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer[J]. Br J Surg . 2010 (11)
  • 2S. H. Baik,Y. T. Ko,C. M. Kang,W. J. Lee,N. K. Kim,S. K. Sohn,H. S. Chi,C. H. Cho.Robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excison of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a pilot randomized trial[J]. Surgical Endoscopy . 2008 (7)
  • 3Anthony R. Lanfranco,Andres E. Castellanos,Jaydev P. Desai,William C. Meyers.Robotic Surgery: A Current Perspective[J]. Annals of Surgery . 2004 (1)
  • 4S.Trastulli,E.Farinella,R.Cirocchi,D.Cavaliere,N.Avenia,F.Sciannameo,N.Gullà,G.Noya,C.Boselli.Robotic resection compared with laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer: systematic review and meta‐analysis of short‐term outcome[J]. Colorectal Disease . 2012 (4)
  • 5James Fleshman,Daniel J. Sargent,Erin Green,Mehran Anvari,Steven J. Stryker,Robert W. Beart,Michael Hellinger,Richard Flanagan,Walter Peters,Heidi Nelson.Laparoscopic Colectomy for Cancer Is Not Inferior to Open Surgery Based on 5-Year Data From the COST Study Group Trial[J]. Annals of Surgery . 2007 (4)
  • 6Jeong Kim,Nam-Kyu Kim,Kang Lee,Hyuk Hur,Byung Min,Jang Kim.A Comparative Study of Voiding and Sexual Function after Total Mesorectal Excision with Autonomic Nerve Preservation for Rectal Cancer: Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Surgery[J]. Annals of Surgical Oncology . 2012 (8)
  • 7Se Jin Baek,Sami AL-Asari,Duck Hyoun Jeong,Hyuk Hur,Byung Soh Min,Seung Hyuk Baik,Nam Kyu Kim.Robotic versus laparoscopic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer[J].Surgical Endoscopy.2013(11)
  • 8Daniel Dindo,Nicolas Demartines,Pierre-Alain Clavien.Classification of Surgical Complications: A New Proposal With Evaluation in a Cohort of 6336 Patients and Results of a Survey[J].Annals of Surgery.2004(2)
  • 9Se-Jin Baek,Seon-Hahn Kim,Jae-Sung Cho,Jae-Won Shin,Jin Kim.Robotic versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Cost Analysis from A Single Institute in Korea[J].World Journal of Surgery.2012(11)
  • 10Yongzhi Yang,Feng Wang,Peng Zhang,Chenzhang Shi,Yang Zou,Huanlong Qin,Yanlei Ma.Robot-Assisted Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Disease, Focusing on Rectal Cancer: A Meta-analysis[J].Annals of Surgical Oncology.2012(12)

共引文献23

同被引文献98

引证文献9

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部