涉农药犯罪司法鉴定问题初探

A preliminary study on the forensic identification of pesticide crime

涉农药犯罪司法鉴定工作作为司法鉴定工作的组成之一,其具有相当强的专业性,但是目前我国司法实践中仍缺乏相对统一和系统的涉农药犯罪司法鉴定制度。基于刑事诉讼目的与效率的平衡,进一步追求程序正义和实体正义,分析了2017年《农药管理条例》施行后42份生产、销售伪劣农药罪刑事裁判文书,发现涉农药犯罪司法鉴定活动混乱有其背后制度性的原因,从立法体系、鉴定程序、采信规则及配套措施4个方面对完善涉农药犯罪司法鉴定问题提出建议,以期为构建标准化、体系化涉农药犯罪司法鉴定工作提供帮助。

As one of the components of the judicial identification work,the judicial identification of pesticide-related crimes is highly professional.However,there is still a lack of a relatively unified and systematic judicial identification system for pesticide-related crimes in my country’s judicial practice.Based on the balance between the purpose and efficiency of criminal proceedings,we further pursued procedural justice and substantive justice.After the implementation of The Regulations on Pesticide Administration in 2017,42 criminal judgment documents for the crime of producing and selling counterfeit and substandard pesticides were analyzed.To investigate the systemic reasons behind it,this paper puts forward some suggestions to improve the judicial identification of pesticide-related crimes from four aspects:legislative system,identification procedures,admissibility rules and supporting measures,with a purpose to providing help for the establishment of standardized and systematic judicial identification of pesticide-related crimes.