期刊文献+

依法治国语境下墨家法律商谈观的现代性转化

The Modern Transformation of Mohisf's View of Legal Discussion in the Context of Ruling the Country by Law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 墨家的法治观与我国现在的依法治国,建设法治国家的理念高度符合,具有鲜明的时代特征。基于交往理性的墨家法律商谈观在交往理性的基础既展现了墨家法治思想的价值精华,也具有现代良法善治的内涵。对墨家法治价值观进行创造性诠释和转化,将其引入现代法律制度、法律机构和法律设施的建设之中,在立法、执法、司法、守法和法律监督五个现代法治国建设的关键环节中注入最为原创的法治本土性资源。现代中国特色社会主义商议式法治国家的构建能够推动中国本源法治思想与现代法治实践相结合,顺应国情,有助于解决现代法治实践中的具有中国特色的法治问题。 Mohisf's concept of rule of law is highly consistent with our country's current concept of ruling the country by law and building a country ruled by law,and has distinct characteristics of the times.The Mohist legal discussion view based on communicative rationality not only shows the value essence of Mohist rule of law thought,but also has the connotation of modem good law and good governance on the basis of communicative rationality.Creatively interpret and transform the values of the rule of law of the Mohist school,introduce them into the construction of modem legal systems,legal institutions and legal facilities,and inject the most original local resource of the rule of law into the five key links of the construction of a modem country ruled by law:legislation,law enforcement,spontaneity,law-abiding and legal supervision.The construction of a modem socialist deliberative rule of law country with Chinese characteristics can promote the integration of Chinese original rule of law thought with modem rule of law practice,conform to the national conditions,and help solve the rule of law problems with Chinese characteristics in the practice of modem rule of law.
作者 余静 张斌峰 Yu Jing;Zhang Binfeng(School of Law,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan 430073,China)
出处 《中南财经政法大学研究生论丛》 2021年第3期138-144,共7页 Journal of the Postgraduates of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law
基金 2017年度贵州省哲学社会科学规划课题:新墨学研究(项目编号:17GZGX21)。部分研究成果。
关键词 墨家法律商谈观 商议式法治 交往理性 商谈程序 The Mohist School of Law Discussion The Deliberative Rule of Law The Communicative Rationality Negotiation Procedure
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献47

  • 1刘作翔.法律的理想与理想的法律[J].政治与法律,1995(1):26-31. 被引量:2
  • 2[德]尤尔根·哈贝马斯.《在事实与规范之间-关于法律和民主法治国的商谈理论》,童世骏译,生活·读书·新知三联书店,2003年版,第35-37页.
  • 3[德]阿列克西.哈贝马斯的法律商谈理论.卡多佐法律评论,1996,(17):1027-1027.
  • 4[德]考夫曼.后现代法哲学-告别演讲[M].米健,译北京:法律出版社,2000:58.
  • 5[美]彼得·古德里奇.法律话语[M].赵洪芳,毛凤凡译.北京:法律出版社,2007.84.
  • 6William Outhwaite, Habermas, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1994, p. 137.
  • 7Habermas: Autonomy and Solidarity - Interviews with Jugen Habennas, Dews, P. (ed.), London: Verso, 1992,p.249, p. 261, p.253.
  • 8David M. Rasmussen and James Swindal( ed. ) : Jurgen Habennos, London: SAGE Publications, 2002, p. 353.
  • 9Habennas: Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, W. Rehg (trans.), Cam- bridge, MA: M1T Press, 1996, p.12, p.14, pp.14-15, p.16, p.37.
  • 10Habennas: Truth and Justification, Barbara Fultner(trans. ), Cambridge, MA: The M1T Press, 2003, p.247.

共引文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部