期刊文献+

保守治疗、切开复位及经皮微创接骨板内固定和髓内钉固定治疗肱骨干骨折的网状Meta分析 被引量:12

Conservative treatment,open reduction,percutaneous minimally invasive plate internal fixation and intramedullary nail fixation in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures:a network meta-analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:肱骨干骨折治疗的主要方法有保守治疗、切开复位内固定、经皮微创接骨板内固定和髓内钉固定,但哪种是最佳的治疗方案仍不清楚。文章运用网状Meta分析,比较保守治疗、切开复位内固定、经皮微创接骨板内固定和髓内钉固定共4种干预措施治疗肱骨干骨折的疗效。方法:检索中国知网、万方、维普、中国生物医学文献数据库、Pub Med、EMbase、The Cochrane Library和Web of Science数据库关于肱骨干骨折治疗的随机对照试验,检索时限为自建库至2021年1月。采用Cochrane协作网推荐的"偏倚风险评估"工具评价纳入文献质量。采用Rev Man 5.4软件和Stata 15.0软件进行网状Meta的图形绘制和数据分析。结果:(1)共纳入23项随机对照试验,共1220例肱骨干骨折患者,对照组为保守治疗,试验组采用切开复位内固定、经皮微创接骨板内固定和髓内钉固定干预;(2)纳入文献质量评价结果显示5篇文献为高质量文献,其他18篇文献为低质量文献;(3)网状Meta排序结果显示:上肢DASH评分,切开复位内固定>保守>经皮微创接骨板内固定>髓内钉固定;肩关节CMS评分,切开复位内固定>经皮微创接骨板内固定>保守>髓内钉固定;骨不连发生率,经皮微创接骨板内固定>切开复位内固定>髓内钉固定>保守;骨折愈合时间,经皮微创接骨板内固定>髓内钉固定>切开复位内固定>保守;医源性桡神经损伤发生率,保守>经皮微创接骨板内固定>髓内钉固定>切开复位内固定;总并发症发生率:保守>经皮微创接骨板内固定>切开复位内固定>髓内钉固定;结论:目前4种修复方法的随机对照试验证据表明,切开复位内固定治疗肱骨干骨折后患者上肢功能与肩关节功能恢复效果最佳,缺点是并发症发生率相对较高。为确保该研究结果的可靠性,未来还需更多的高质量随机对照试验来验证。 OBJECTIVE:The main methods for the treatment of humeral shaft fractures are conservative treatment,open reduction and internal fixation,percutaneous minimally invasive plate internal fixation and intramedullary nail fixation,but the best treatment is still unclear.The network meta-analysis was used to compare the efficacy of conservative treatment,open reduction and internal fixation,percutaneous minimally invasive plate internal fixation and intramedullary nail fixation in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures.METHODS:A randomized controlled study on the treatment of humeral shaft fractures was searched in CNKI,Wangfang,VIP,Chinese BioMedical Literature Database,PubMed,EMbase,The Cochrane library and Web of Science.The search period was from inception to January 2021.The"bias risk assessment"tool recommended by Cochrane Collaboration Network was used to evaluate the quality of the literature.The RevMan 5.4 software and Stata 15.0 software were used to draw the graph and analyze the data of the network Meta.RESULTS:(1)A total of 23 randomized controlled trials were included.A total of 1220 patients with humeral shaft fractures were divided into experimental group and control group.The control group was treated conservatively,and the experimental group was treated with open reduction and internal fixation,percutaneous minimally invasive plate internal fixation and intramedullary nail fixation.(2)Literature quality evaluation was included:5 articles were of high quality and the other 18 were of low quality.(3)In terms of DASH score,the order of network Meta was as follows:open reduction and internal fixation>conservative>percutaneous minimally invasive plate internal fixation>intramedullary nail fixation.In terms of CMS score,the order of network Meta was as follows:open reduction and internal fixation>percutaneous minimally invasive plate internal fixation>conservative>intramedullary nail fixation.In terms of bone nonunion,the order of network Meta was as follows:percutaneous minimally invasive plate internal fixation>open reduction internal fixation>intramedullary nail fixation>conservative treatment.In terms of fracture healing time,the order of network Meta was as follows:percutaneous minimally invasive plate internal fixation>intramedullary nail fixation>open reduction and internal fixation>conservative.The network Meta order of iatrogenic radial nerve injury was conservative>percutaneous minimally invasive plate fixation>intramedullary nail fixation>open reduction and internal fixation.The order of total complications of network Meta was conservative>percutaneous minimally invasive plate internal fixation>open reduction and internal fixation>intramedullary nail fixation.CONCLUSION:A comprehensive analysis of the results of the network meta-analysis of the four intervention measures showed that the upper limb function DASH score and shoulder CMS score of the affected limb after open reduction and internal fixation were the best,but the incidence of complications was relatively high.More high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to ensure the reliability of the results.
作者 熊晨 何贵平 张堃 何晓 杨佳瑞 何昌军 王晓龙 王晨 师政伟 朱养均 衡立松 Xiong Chen;He Guiping;Zhang Kun;He Xiao;Yang Jiarui;He Changjun;Wang Xiaolong;Wang Chen;Shi Zhengwei;Zhu Yangjun;Heng Lisong(Yan’an University,Yan’an 716000,Shaanxi Province,China;Department of Orthopedic and Trauma,Honghui Hospital,Xi’an Jiaotong University,Xi’an 710054,Shaanxi Province,China;Pingliang Rehabilitation Center Hospital,Pingliang 744000,Gansu Province,China)
出处 《中国组织工程研究》 CAS 北大核心 2021年第36期5878-5887,共10页 Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
基金 陕西省重点研发计划项目(2017SF-197),项目负责人:衡立松 西安市科技计划项目[20YXYJ004(8)],项目负责人:衡立松。
关键词 肱骨 肱骨干骨折 切开复位内固定 经皮微创接骨板内固定 髓内钉固定 保守治疗 网状Meta分析 bone humerus humeral shaft fracture open reduction and internal fixation percutaneous minimally invasive plate internal fixation intramedullary nail fixation conservative treatment network meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献96

  • 1李斌,白靖平,吴泰相,刁骧(审校).髓内钉固定与加压钢板内固定比较治疗成人肱骨干骨折的系统评价[J].中国循证医学杂志,2006,6(10):705-711. 被引量:9
  • 2罗从风,姜锐,胡承方,陆男吉,仲飙,曾炳芳.锁定加压钢板微创固定治疗肱骨干骨折的初步报告[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2006,8(11):1005-1009. 被引量:61
  • 3何寒青,陈坤.Meta分析中的异质性检验方法[J].中国卫生统计,2006,23(6):486-487. 被引量:102
  • 4唐明杰,喻鑫罡,曾炳芳,孙玉强,于晓雯.可膨胀髓内钉治疗肱骨骨折的初步研究[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2007,9(8):745-747. 被引量:2
  • 5王亦璁.骨与关节损伤[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2010:17-18.
  • 6Mahabier KC,Vogels LM,Punt BJ,et al.Humeral shaft fractures:retrospective results of non-operative and operative treatment of 186patients[J].Injury,2013,44(4):427-430.
  • 7Ekholm R,Adami J,Tidermark J,et al.Fractures of the shaft of the humerus.An epidemiological study of 401 fractures[J].J Bone Joint Surg Br,2006,88(11):1469-1473.
  • 8Heineman DJ,Poolman RW,Nork SE,et al.Plate fixation or intramedullary fixation of humeral shaft fractures[J].Acta Orthop,2010,81(2):216-223.
  • 9Hwang YS,Kim KY,Kim HC,et al.Polarus intramedullary nail for proximal humeral and humeral shaft fractures in elderly patients with osteoporosis[J].J Kor Frac Soci,2013,26(1):14.
  • 10Livani B,Belangero W,Medina G,et al.Anterior plating as a surgical alternative in the treatment of humeral shaft non-union[J].Int Orthop,2010,34(7):1025-1031.

共引文献105

同被引文献126

引证文献12

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部