摘要
在硬质合金这一典型工科专业课的讲授中进行“翻转课堂”和传统教学模式的对比授课。结果表明:新型教学模式能够为广大学生接受,且对学习成绩的提高有所助益。但与传统教学模式相比,新型教学模式更适合在小班环境中实施。本次教学模式对比研究为后续工科专业课的教学改革提供了一定的实践基础。
A comparative study between"Flipped Classroom"and traditional teaching modes have been carried out during the teaching of Cemented Carbide,and the results indicate that most of the students are ready to accept the advanced teaching mode,which could improve the students'academic records.However,comparing with the traditional teaching mode,the advanced mode is more suitable to be put into practice in a small scaled class.Such comparative study could pave a way for the subsequent teaching reform of the engineering courses.
出处
《高教学刊》
2021年第17期80-83,共4页
Journal of Higher Education
基金
2020年度安徽省重大线上教学改革研究项目“材料类专业线上教学运行与教学模式改革研究”(编号:2020zdxsjg278)
2017年度合肥工业大学教学质量与教学改革工程建设项目“‘翻转课堂’教学模式在粉体材料类课程教学中的实践及应用效果评价”(编号:JYYB1729)
2019年度合肥工业大学材料科学与工程学院教改培育项目“《材料分析测试方法》PBL式教学探索”(编号:2019CLXYJY03)研究成果
关键词
“翻转课堂”模式
传统教学模式
对比研究
工科专业课
"Flipped Classroom"mode
traditional teaching mode
comparative study
engineering courses
