期刊文献+

金砖国家碳排放与经济增长脱钩弹性及驱动因素——基于Tapio脱钩和LMDI模型的分析 被引量:54

Decoupling analysis between energy consumption and economic growth in BRICS countries:Based on Tapio decoupling and LMDI model analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 在金砖国家低碳转型的压力之下,把握碳排放驱动因素、明确碳排放与经济增长的相关性从而完善减排政策迫在眉睫。基于1987—2017年金砖国家碳排放面板数据,采用Tapio脱钩模型分析经济增长与碳排放的脱钩关系变化,进一步结合IPAT方程和LMDI模型分解影响碳排放量变化的驱动因素。研究表明:金砖国家整体上呈现由负脱钩到弱脱钩再到强脱钩的变化趋势,现阶段中国、印度和俄罗斯碳排放脱钩关系为弱脱钩,南非和巴西的碳排放脱钩分别为强脱钩和扩张负脱钩,金砖国家之间脱钩关系存在阶段性差异;经济强度因素和人口因素是碳排放的主要正向驱动因素,能源强度因素则对碳排放具有抑制作用,金砖国家之间驱动因素的作用程度存在显著差异。因此,可以从增加技术投入、提高能源利用效率、严控高能耗产业、构建减排工作国际合作平台等方面入手促进金砖国家减排。 Based on BRICS carbon emission panel data in 1987-2017, Tapio index model was used to analyze the decoupling relationship between economic growth and carbon emissions, and combines IPAT equation and LMDI model were used to decompose driving factors affecting carbon emissions. Result showed that BRICS countries generally showed a trend of decoupling from weak decoupling to strong decoupling. Decoupling relationships of carbon emissions in China, India and Russia were weak decoupling, while that of South Africa and Brazil were strong and expansion negative decoupling. Economic strength and population factor were main positive drivers of carbon emissions, and energy intensity factor had a restraining effect on carbon emissions. Therefore, increasing technology input, improving energy efficiency and strictly controlling high-energy consumption industries is vital for emission reduction work.
作者 王杰 李治国 谷继建 WANG Jie;LI Zhiguo;GU Jijian(China University of Petroleum(East China),Qingdao 266580,China;Chongqing Vocational College of Transportation,Chongqing 402247,China)
出处 《世界地理研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第3期501-508,共8页 World Regional Studies
基金 国家社科基金面上项目产业链多源数据融合的环保税税源风险评估方法应用研究(2020BTJ060)。
关键词 碳排放 Tapio脱钩 LMDI模型 金砖国家 carbon emissions Tapio decoupling model LMDI model BRICS countries
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献76

  • 1Bowden,Nicholas&Payne,James E.,The causal relationship between U.S.energy consumption and real output:A disaggregated analysis[J].Journal of Policy Modeling vol.31(2),180-188,2009.
  • 2BP世界能源统计年鉴(2009).
  • 3Ghali,K.H.,EI-Sakka,M.I.T.,Energy and output growth in Canada:a multivariate cointegration analysis[J].Energy Economics 26,225-238,2004.
  • 4Lee,C.C.,Chiang,C.,Energy consumption and economic growth in Asian countries:a more comprehensive analysis using panel data[J].Resource and Energy Economics 30,50-65,2008.
  • 5Lutkepohl,H.,Non-causality due to omitted variables[J].Journal of Econometrics 19,367-378,1982.
  • 6Narayan,P.K.,Smyth,R.,Energy consumption and real GDP in G7 countries,new evidence from panel cointrgration with structural breaks[J].Energy Economics 30,2331-2341,2008.
  • 7Soytas,U.,Sari,R.,The relationship between energy and production:evidence from Turkish manufacturing industry[J].Energy Economics 29,1151-1165,2007.
  • 8Stern,D.I.,A multivariate cointegration analysis of the role of energy in the US macroeconomy[J].Energy Economics 22,267-283,2000.
  • 9Wolde-Rufael,Y.,The long-run relationship between petroleum imports and economic growth:the case of Cyprus[J].Resources,Energy and Development 5,95-103,2008.
  • 10World Development Indictors.World Bank,Washington,2009.

共引文献241

同被引文献838

引证文献54

二级引证文献264

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部