期刊文献+

汽车自动紧急制动系统行人避障策略及仿真 被引量:4

The Pedestrian Obstacle Avoidance Strategy and Simulation of Auto Automatic Emergency Braking System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为进一步提高汽车自动紧急制动系统对行人的安全保护功能,设计一种上层采用模糊控制方法和下层采用PID控制方法的联合分层控制行人避障策略。基于某款E级SUV车辆,建立相应的动力学模型,在实际行人测试环境下,建立基于碰撞时间算法的风险评价模型,为了验证所提出控制策略的有效性,通过Simulink和Carsim联合仿真进行测试验证。仿真测试结果表明,所提出的行人避障控制策略达到C-NCAP行人测试工况标准,与行人最小安全距离为0.9 m。在保证安全的前提下,模糊控制方法可调整制动强度,减速度控制在4.8~6.1 m/s 2,能够使车辆具有较好的舒适性。 To further improve the safety protection function of auto automatic emergency braking system for pedestrians,a combined hierarchical control strategy of fuzzy control for the upper layer and PID control for the lower layer was designed.Based on a certain E-class SUV vehicle,the corresponding dynamics model was established.In the actual pedestrian test environment,a risk evaluation model based on Time to Collision was established.To verify the effectiveness of the proposed control strategy,Simulink and Carsim co-simulation were applied.Simulation test results show that the proposed pedestrian avoidance control strategy meets the standard of C-NCAP pedestrian test conditions,and the minimum safe distance between the pedestrian and the pedestrian is 0.9 m.On the premise of ensured safety,and by the fuzzy control method,the braking strength can be adjusted and the speed can be reduced within 4.8~6.1 m/s 2,providing better comfort for vehicles have better comfort.
作者 向世林 XIANG Shilin(China Automotive Engineering Research Institute Co.,Ltd.,Chongqing 401122,China)
出处 《机械制造与自动化》 2021年第3期113-117,共5页 Machine Building & Automation
关键词 自动紧急制动 模糊控制 行人避障策略 联合仿真 automatic emergency braking fuzzy control pedestrian avoidance strategies the joint simulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献19

  • 1Autonomous Emergency Braking-AEB.2013-7-2.
  • 2MbnicabPla. Assessment methodologies for forward looking Integrated Pedestrian and further extension to Cyclists Safety. 2013-7-2.
  • 3Niewi-hner W, Roth F,et al. Gwehenberger. Proposal for a Test Procedure of Assistance Systems regarding Preventive Pedestrian Protection. Proceedings of the 22nd International Technic, al Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV), 2011.
  • 4Niew6hner W. ActiveTest D2.1 Final workshop summary. 2013-6-28.
  • 5National Highway Traffic Safety Administration: Pre-Crash Scenario Typology for Crash Avoidance Research, Washington DC:NHTSA,2007.
  • 6Mohamed Abdel-Aty. Analysis of driver injury se- verity levelsat multiple locations using ordered pro- bitmodels[J]. Journalof Safety Research, 2003, 34 (5) :597-603.
  • 7Hayward J C. Near-miss determination through use of a scale of danger[J]. Highway Research Record, 1972(384) : 24-34.
  • 8Vogel K. A comparison of headway and time to col- lision as safety indicators[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2003,35(3) :427-433.
  • 9Kiefera R J, LeBlancb D J, Flannaganb C A. Devel- oping an inverse time-to-collision crash alert timing approachbased on drivers' last-secondss braking and steering judgments[J]. Accident Analysis and Pre- vention, 2005,37 : 295-303.
  • 10Balas V E, Balas M M. Driver assisting by inverse time to collision [C] // Budapest/Hungary: IEEE, World Automation Congress (WAC), 2006:24-26.

共引文献120

同被引文献76

引证文献4

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部