期刊文献+

论西方哲学历史上形而上学潜在的思想暴力

On the Potential ideological Violence of Metaphysics in the History of Western Philosophy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 形而上学的历史可以溯源至古希腊时期,在历史长河中,哲学家们一直就形而上学的问题进行探讨。形而上学在人类历史中的地位十分重要,但近代以来人们对形而上学的批判与否定却与日俱增,这让我们不得不正视形而上学本身的缺陷与不足。正如海德格尔所说,人们无论如何也无法摆脱形而上学,但当形而上学被幻化为神圣的全能原则、被世俗化为同一原则时,深处形而上学中心的人们又会被形而上学的思维模式如何影响?会产生何种可怖的后果?主动性思想能产生多大的建设作用,被动的平庸之恶又能产生多大的破坏作用?形而上学的思想暴力又有多大危害?这些都是我们直面形而上学需要深切反思的当代现实问题。 The history of metaphysics can be traced back to the period of ancient Greece.In the long history,philosophers have been discussing the issue of metaphysics.The position of metaphysics in human history is very important,but since modern times,people's criticism and denial of metaphysics has been increasing day by day,which makes us have to face up to the defects and deficiencies of metaphysics itself.As Heidegger said,people can't get rid of metaphysics anyway,but when metaphysics is transformed into a sacred almighty principle and the secular into the same principle,how will people at the center of metaphysics be affected by metaphysical thinking?What are the terrible consequences?How much constructive effect can active thinking have,and how much destructive effect can passive banal evil have?How harmful is the ideological violence of metaphysics?These are contemporary real issues that requires deep reflection when facing metaphysics.
作者 张玉武 ZHANG Yuwu(School of Public Administration, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, Hunan 410081)
出处 《绵阳师范学院学报》 2021年第6期38-43,49,共7页 Journal of Mianyang Teachers' College
关键词 形而上学 思想暴力 平庸之恶 逻各斯中心主义 metaphysics ideological violence the evil of mediocrity logocentrism
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献8

  • 1德里达 张宁 译.书写与差异[M].北京:三联书店,2001..
  • 2NIETZSCHE.On Truth and Lie an Extra-Moral Sense[A]. the Portable Nietzsche [C].New York, 1976.
  • 3SAUSSURE.Course in General Linguistics [M].New York, 1966.
  • 4[瑞]索绪尔,高名凯.普通语言学教程[M].商务印书馆,1980.
  • 5DERRIDA. Of Grammatology [M].Johns Hopkins,1998.
  • 6ANDERSON. Reality Isn't What It Used to Be[A]. SOLOMON. Continental Philosophy since[C]. 1750.
  • 7德里达.论文字学[A].尚杰.德里达[C].湖南教育出版社,1999.
  • 8DERIDA. Writing and Difference [M].Unversity of Chicago Press, 1978.

共引文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部