期刊文献+

常规器械经脐单孔三通道法腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜下全子宫切除术的对比研究 被引量:9

Comparison of the effect between laparoscopic surgery through conventional umbilical single-hole three-channel method and traditional laparoscopic in total hysterectomy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:比较常规器械经脐单孔三通道法腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜全子宫切除术临床应用效果对比。方法:回顾分析2018年3月~2019年11月在该院就诊有全子宫切除指征患者,按手术方式不同,分为常规器械经脐单孔三通道法腹腔镜和传统腹腔镜组。其中行传统腹腔镜下全子宫切除术共30例为对照组,常规器械经脐单孔三通道法腹腔镜全子宫切除术30例为观察组。比较两组患者术中出血量、手术时间、气腹介质使用总量、术后肛门排气时间、术后疼痛评分、切口美容满意度、术后住院时间、手术耗材费用等方面的差异。结果:观察组的手术时间、出血量、手术耗材费用与对照组比较无明显差异;观察组术后肛门排气时间、术后住院时间、术后疼痛评分低于对照组;观察组术后切口美容满意度评分高于对照组。结论:常规器械经脐单孔三通道法腹腔镜下全子宫切除术能满足患者的美容心理需求,降低患者术后疼痛,缩短术后肛门排气时间、缩短住院时间,并不增加患者手术时间、术中出血、手术耗材费用,手术安全、可行,符合卫生经济学成本,可在妇科手术领域中推广。 Objective To compare the clinical application effect of conventional instruments through umbilical single-hole three-channel laparoscopy and traditional laparoscopic total hysterectomy.Methods Patients with indications for total hysterectomy in the hospital from March 2018 to November 2019 were divided into conventional equipment through the umbilical single-hole three-channel laparoscopic group and traditional laparoscopic group.Among them,30 cases underwent laparoscopic total hysterectomy in the traditional group were set as the control group,and 30 cases underwent laparoscopic total hysterectomy through the umbilical single-hole three-channel method in the conventional group as the observation group.The intraoperative blood loss,operation time,total pneumoperitoneum media usage,postoperative anal exhaust time,postoperative pain score,incision beauty satisfaction,postoperative hospital stay,and surgical consumables costs were compared between the two groups.Results The operation time,bleeding volume,and surgical consumables costs of the observation group were not statistically significant compared with the control group;the postoperative anal exhaust time,postoperative hospital stay,and postoperative pain score of the observation group were lower than those of the control group,Postoperative incision beauty satisfaction score was higher than the control group.Conclusion Conventional instruments through the umbilical single-hole three-channel laparoscopic total hysterectomy can meet the patient’s cosmetic psychological needs,reduce the patient’s postoperative pain,shorten the postoperative anal exhaust time,shorten the hospital stay,and not increase the patient’s surgical time 2.The cost of intraoperative bleeding and surgical consumables.The operation is safe and feasible.It meets the cost of health economics and can be promoted in the field of gynecological surgery.
作者 陈义波 郭海春 朱辉玲 林蓓蓓 张静 龙玲 Chen Yi-bo;Guo Hai-chun;Zhu Hui-ling;Lin Bei-bei;Zhang Jing;Long Ling(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Changsha Hospital for Maternal and Child Health Care,Changsha 410007,China)
出处 《湖南师范大学学报(医学版)》 2021年第2期123-126,共4页 Journal of Hunan Normal University(Medical Sciences)
关键词 常规器械经脐单孔三通道法腹腔镜手术 传统腹腔镜 全子宫切除术 临床效果 laparoscopic surgery through conventional umbilical single-hole three-channel method traditional laparoscopy total hysterectomy clinical effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献55

  • 1Musquera M, Peri L, Izquierdo L, et al. Is LESS/NOTES surgery the new gold standard of minimally invasive surgery? [ J]. Arch Esp Urol,2013 ,66 :161-167.
  • 2Lee YY, Kim TJ, Kim CJ, et al. Single port access laparoscopic adnexal surgery versus conventional laparoscopic adnexal surgery:a comparison of peri-operative outcomes[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Bio1,2010,151 : 181-184.
  • 3Fagotti A, Fanfani F, Marocco F, et al. Laparoendoscopic single- site surgery (LESS) for ovarian cyst enucleation : report of first 3 cases[J]. Fertil Steril,2009,92 : 1168.
  • 4Fader AN, Escobar PF. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in gynecologic oncology:technique and initial report[ Jl. Gynecol Onca1,2009,114 : 157-161.
  • 5Pelosi MA, Pelosi MA 3rd. Laparoscopic hysterectomy with bilateral salpingooophorectomy using a single umbilical puncture [ J]. N J Med,1991,88 : 721-726.
  • 6Fagotti A, Fanfani F, Marocco F, et al. Laparoendoscopic singleite surgery ( LESS ) for ovarian cyst enucleation: report of first 3eases[J]. Fertil Steri, 2009, 92: 1168. e13-16.
  • 7Raman JD, Bensalah K, Bagrodia A, ct al. Laboratory and clinical development of single keyhole umbilical nephrectomy [ J ]. Urology ,2007,70 : 1039-1042.
  • 8Lee YY, Kim TJ, Kim CJ, et al. Single-port access laparoscopic adnexal surgery versus conventional laparoscopic adnexal surgery: a compm'ison of perioperative outcomes[ J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Bio, 2010, 151: 181-184.
  • 9Park HS, Kim TJ, Song T, et al. Single-port access ( SPA ) laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: a surgeon, sexperience with an initia 1200 cases[ J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2011, 154:81-84.
  • 10Lee YY, Kim TJ, Kim CJ, et al assisted vaginal hysterectomy : a Single-port access laparoseopic novel method with a wound retractor and a glove [ J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2009, 16: 450- 453.

共引文献334

同被引文献121

引证文献9

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部