期刊文献+

孕晚期宫内生长受限胎儿彩色多普勒血流显像相关参数变化及临床意义 被引量:16

The changes and clinical significance of parameters related to fetal color Doppler flow imaging with fetal growth restriction in late pregnancy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探究孕晚期宫内生长受限胎儿的彩色多普勒血流现象相关参数变化及临床意义。方法:选择2018年8月~2020年1月我院收治67例孕晚期FGR产妇作为FGR组,另选择同期50例正常分娩的孕晚期孕妇作为对照组。产前行彩色多普勒超声检查,测量各血管的RI、PI和S/D等血流显像相关参数。结果:FGR组MCA的RI、RI和S/D值分别为(0.66±0.11)、(0.97±0.26)、(2.94±0.71),均明显低于对照组,FGR组UA、DV及UtA的RI、RI和S/D值分别为[(0.69±0.18)、(1.18±0.26)、(3.41±0.73)],[(0.62±0.14)、(1.15±0.33)、(3.58±0.82)],[(0.54±0.15)、(0.81±0.19)、(2.11±0.56)],均明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义。Apgar≤7分组MCA的RI、RI和S/D值分别为(0.63±0.09)、(0.91±0.15)、(2.86±0.49),均明显低于Apgar>7分组(分别为(0.81±0.13)、(1.46±0.32)、(4.58±0.71)),Apgar≤7分组UA、DV及UtA的RI、RI和S/D值分别为[(0.73±0.14)、(1.23±0.27)、(3.46±0.64)],[(0.69±0.17)、(1.17±0.26)、(3.66±0.71)],[(0.61±0.14)、(0.84±0.19)、(2.18±0.44)],均明显高于Apgar>7分组(分别为[[(0.54±0.11)、(0.89±0.16)、(2.11±0.33)],[(0.47±0.08)、(0.64±0.15)、(1.96±0.46)],[(0.36±0.06)、(0.53±0.11)、(1.71±0.28)]),差异有统计学意义。结论:孕晚期FGR发生时,胎儿各血管的血流参数均会出现异常改变,且与宫内生长受限程度密切相关,对于其临床诊治及妊娠结局的预测都具有重要价值。 Objective To research the changes and clinical significance of parameters related to fetal color Doppler flow imaging with fetal growth restriction in late pregnancy.Method From August 2018 to January 2020,67 FGR pregnant women in our hospital were selected as the FGR group,and 50 normal delivery pregnant women in the same period were selected as the control group.The parameters of RI,PI and S/D were measured.Result The RI,RI and S/D of MCA in FGR group were (0.66±0.11),(0.97±0.26),(2.94±0.71),respectively,thoses were significantly lower than those in control group,the RI,RI and S/D values of UA,DV and UtA in FGR group were [(0.69±0.18),(1.18±0.26),(3.41±0.73)],[(0.62±0.14),(1.15±0.33),(3.58±0.82)],[(0.54±0.15),(0.81±0.19),(2.11±0.56)],respectively,those were significantly lower than those in control group,the differences wee statistically significant.The RI,RI and S/D of MCA in the Apgar≤7 group were (0.63±0.09),(0.91±0.15),(2.86±0.49),respectively,thoses were significantly lower than those in the Apgar>7 group ((0.81±0.13),(1.46±0.32),(4.58±0.71),respectively),the RI,RI and S/D values of UA,DV and UtA in the Apgar≤7 group were [(0.73±0.14),(1.23±0.27),(3.46±0.64)],[(0.69±0.17),(1.17±0.26),(3.66±0.71)],[(0.61±0.14),(0.84±0.19),(2.18±0.44)],respectively,thoses were significantly lower than those in the Apgar>7 group ([(0.54±0.11),(0.89±0.16),(2.11±0.33)],[(0.47±0.08),(0.64±0.15),(1.96±0.46)],[(0.36±0.06),(0.53±0.11),(1.71±0.28)],respectively),the differences wee statistically significant.Conclusion When FGR occurs in late pregnancy,the blood flow parameters of blood vessels will change abnormally,and the abnormal changes are closely related to the degree of intrauterine growth restriction,which is of great value for clinical diagnosis and treatment and prediction of pregnancy outcome.
作者 高文凯 王瑞玲 王凤梅 杨林松 Gao Wen-kai;Wang Rui-ling;Wang Feng-mei;Yang Lin-song(Department of Gyncology and Otstetrics,Ciril Ariation General Hospial,Bejing 100123,China;Department of Ultrasound,Civil AviationGeneral Hospiual,Berjing 100123,China;Department of Ultrasound,Huguosi Haspital of trditional Chinese Medicine,Beijing 100035,China)
出处 《湖南师范大学学报(医学版)》 2021年第1期150-154,共5页 Journal of Hunan Normal University(Medical Sciences)
关键词 孕晚期 胎儿宫内生长受限 彩色多普勒超声 大脑中动脉 脐动脉 静脉导管 子宫动脉 血流动力学参数 late pregnancy fetal growth restriction color doppler ultrasound middle cerebral artery umbilical artery ductus venosus uterine artery hemodynamic parameters
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献77

  • 1刘艳鸽,杨秀丽.肝素治疗胎儿生长受限27例临床研究[J].中国现代应用药学,2006,23(S1):671-673. 被引量:13
  • 2韩小英,于荣,刘维靖.胎儿宫内生长受限相关临床因素的分析[J].首都医科大学学报,2005,26(3):348-350. 被引量:14
  • 3艾红,鱼博浪,尹益民,苏继莲,任晓萍,潘文倩,何跟山.中晚孕期正常胎儿静脉导管血流动力学研究[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2006,15(5):371-373. 被引量:14
  • 4ACOG practice bulletin. Intrauterine growth restriction[J]. Int J Gynecol Obstet, 2013,121(5): 1122-1133.
  • 5Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.RCOG Green Top Guideline Number 31:The investigation and management of the small-for-gestational-age fetus[EB/OL].[2015-03-01], http: //www.guideline.gov/content.aspx?id:44347.
  • 6Fowden AL, Ward JW, Wooding FPB, et al. Programming pla- cental nutrient transfer capacity[J]j Physiol,2006,572:5-15.
  • 7Song Z, Regnauh TRH, Paige L, et al. Placental adaptations in growth restriction [J].Nutrients,2015,7:360-389.
  • 8Thompson MO, Vines SK, Aquilina J, et al. Are placental lakesof any clinical significance? [J]. Placenta,2002, 23:685 - 690.
  • 9Erel CT, Dane B, Calay Z, et al. Apoptosis in the placenta of pregnancies complicated with IUGR[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2001,73: 229-235.
  • 10Salafia CM, Charles AK,Mass EM. Placenta and fetal growth re- striction[J]. Clin Obstet Gynecol,2006,49(2):236-256.

共引文献182

同被引文献133

引证文献16

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部