期刊文献+

后常规科学时代的风险传播:起点、规范与理性根基 被引量:6

Risk Communication in the Age of Post-Normal Science:Research Starting Point,Normal Structure and Fundamental Reason
原文传递
导出
摘要 风险社会的根本出路在于有效的风险治理,而风险传播在风险治理中处于关键环节。将后常规风险观作为风险传播的研究起点,有助于超越实在论与建构论之间的风险观争议。后常规科学反映了科学知识生产方式在风险社会的转型,其规范结构关乎风险传播中的信任机制重塑。有必要重视专家系统的主动信任和公众的合理不信任,以实现科学理性与交往理性的融通;同时应补足风险传播能力建设的短板,从而打造共建共治共享的社会治理格局。 The ultimate solution of risk society is the effective risk governance,while risk communication plays a crucial role in the risk governance framework.The paper views the concept of post-normal risk as the starting point of risk communication research,along with a conceptual formula:Risk=Probability×Consequence±Trust Mechanisms.The reflective perspective from STS is helpful for overcome the dilemma of realism and constructivism on defining risk.The production mode of science knowledge in risk society has transformed into‘post-normal science’,and the ethos of its normal structure can be concluded as Transparency,Robustness,Uncertainty management,Sustainability,Transdisciplinarity(TRUST as the abbreviation).These norms of post-normal science relate to the restore of trust mechanisms in risk communication context.To combine scientific rationality and communicative rationality,we should consider the active trust of expert system and public’s rational distrust symmetrically.Meanwhile,the various mini-publics provide legitimacy space for public engagement in the process of risk governance.
作者 黄晓伟 Huang Xiaowei(Fiesearch Center for Science,Technology and Society,Tianjin University)
出处 《新闻界》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第5期40-46,共7页 Journalism and Mass Communication
基金 国家社科基金青年项目“互构论视域的算法风险生成逻辑及治理机制研究”(19CZX012)。
关键词 风险传播 后常规科学 信任机制 交往理性 Risk Communication Post-Normal Science Trust Mechanisms Communicative Rationality
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献53

  • 1石顺科.英文“科普”称谓探识[J].科普研究,2007,2(2):63-66. 被引量:25
  • 2张乐,童星.公众的“核邻避情结”及其影响因素分析[J].社会科学研究,2014(1):105-111. 被引量:28
  • 3田松.科学传播——一个新兴的学术领域[J].新闻与传播研究,2007,14(2):81-90. 被引量:80
  • 4巴伯.科学与社会秩序[M].北京:三联书店出版社,1991.172.
  • 5西方哲学原著选读(上卷)[M].北京:商务印书馆.1981:54.
  • 6布鲁诺·雅科米:技术史[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2000.
  • 7Barry Barnes, Sociology of Science: Selected Readings, London and Baltimore:Penguin Books, 1972,pp.9 - 10.
  • 8R. K. Merton, The Sociology of Science, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973, p. X Viii.
  • 9Ian I. Mitroff, Norms and counter- norms in a select group of the Apollo moon scientists:A case study of the ambivalence of scientists,American Sociological Review, vol. 39,1974, pp. 579 - 595.
  • 10John Ziman, Prometheus Bound: Science in a dynamic steady state,London:Cambridge University Press, 1994.

共引文献124

引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部